And #IgnoranceOfTheLaw Excuses by government officers
One of the first things a police officer and/or a judge will tell you for not knowing about any one of the millions of laws on the books in the given town/s, county/s, state/s, and federal district/s you may be in at any given moment -- those officers and judges will tell you that "Ignorance of the law is no excuse for violating it."
Yet, the very first EXCUSE that those officers and judges run to is gross ignorance of the Supreme Law of the Land to which they swore oath to uphold and defend; some against enemies both foreign and domestic.
There excuse is that they do not have to know whether or not a law violates the US Constitution; that is what the courts are for. Thus #Ignorance
Lower-level judges claim that you can always appeal the case to another upper-level court-- al the way to the US Supreme Court (if you can afford to do so. Thus, claiming that their IGNORANCE of the law is a justifiable excuse for violating your rights that they swore oath to defend and protect, via the US Constitution.
One you know How To Learn -- You can teach yourself anything
If you are over the age of 3 -- and your parents and teacher have not taught you HOW TO LEARN -- fire them and get new ones.
If #realDonaldTrump and #CleanHonestGov are not the same -- go with CleanHonestGov.com
In #LafayetteSquare in #WashingtonDC many #TrumpSupporters seem to think that my CleanHonestGov.com website is #AntiTrump.
It is not against Trump. If anything, Mr. Trump, as one of my (our) employees in government, it is my duty to try to help him do a grand a #constitutional job as he can to help right a failing nation and failed government.
#2 Clean Honest Government
Replace #1 #ASAP
A #Post by 1785 definition is a #Message
A #PostOffice is a place that delivers and processes messages or Posts.
A #PostRoad is nothing other than the means by which to get that post from sender to receiver.
The Internet is a Post Road
Message services (such as; #Google #Facebook #YouTube #Twitter #Instagram and a host of others) are Post Offices.
If #Congress actually took the time to think through this process, they can literally regulate the internet exactly like the do the #USPO #USPS thus prohibiting providers from censoring content.
Unfortunately, far too many #Legislators #LawEnforcement and #Judges take the phrase from The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 1, Section 8, Last Clause, as the power to legislate in all areas whatsoever.
This simply is not true.
We know this, only when we take our Government's two documents together:
Let's look at how many time the "Severability" clause appears in The United States Code:
The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 6 has an interesting severability clause concerning State Constitution, and all Laws (federal, state, etc)
When Law-Makers, Law-Enforcers, and Law-Triers swear Oath to the US Constitution, as they all do (city, county, state, national) they claim that they know enough to be able to determine whether or not some law or part thereof -- violates-- the Supreme Law of the Land. After all..Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse for violating that SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND -- now is it?
What is the first thing a cop or judge tells you for not knowing the millions of laws (city, county, state, nation) when they ticket or arrest your for violating them? Ignorance of the Law is not Excuse!
What is the first EXCUSE those cops and judges rely upon when it comes. IGNORANCE! They claim that they are not supposed to judge whether or not a law violates the US Constitution --The Supreme Law of the Land or not. That, after all, is left between you and the US Supreme Court, if you have enough money, time, and other resources to even get it that far, let alone to even be heard.
Those same cops and judges benefit financially from their GROSS IGNORANCE of the Law they swore oath to. Their Excuses?
We allowed our governments to return us to pre-1776 political corruption --- AND WE DID NOTHING to stop it!!!
#ArmedRobbery #Kidnapping #Extortion #DestructionOfEvidence #Treason #Tyranny
Notice: As they approach they refuse to identify the cause for the action, even after repeated requests.
I am supposed to be a mind reader?
As she is cuffing me, she shuts off the camera -- thus destroying EVIDENCE FOR THE DEFENSE.
The female officer, while asking me to identify myself, has trouble spelling.
With previous encounters with police of various sort, they tend to frown on people who are not "cooperative".
She ask for my middle name: "What is your middle name?"
I respond with, "Melzine."
She asks me, "Spell it."
Me, "I. T."
Then, she asks, "Spell that."
She warns that she will only ask me one more time.
I advise that she word her question to solicit the exact response that she wants from me.
She asks, "Spell Your Middle Name."
Me, "Y.O.U.R. M.I.D.D.L.E. N.A.M.E."
Her partner, under his breathe, requests, "Spell Melzine."
At which point, I spell "M.E.L.Z.I.N.E."
I was not informed of the nature of the arrest, a violation of US Constitution, Amendment 6
Nor, when booked, was I provided a copy of the police report, a list of my property (evidence or otherwise).
I was held, supposedly for trial, without a Grand Jury indictment, a violation against Amendment 5. If it requires an indictment for serious crimes to hold a person for trial--- imagine how much more difficult it is supposed to be to hold someone for the serious crime of (which was changes from "Panhandling-Aggressive; to solicited Alms and contributions without authorization", which in either case, is protected under Amendment 9 of the US Constitution (ALL those other rights we, the people RETAINED).
Then, while awaiting "Arraignment", I am cut loose simply with a "Record of NO PAPER ACTION", which does several things:
These acts of government are becoming so frequent, they literally CREATE criminals from innocent people who stood up for our rights and committed committed an offense against corrupted government.
This, and three other very similar crimes were recently reported to the FBI.
Now it is time to see if there is any honor in the FBI, or whether they will simply go along to get along with the corruption.
I smell the like of #Hitler on the rise.
For #Violating the #Constitution
In a huge percentages of times, you will be correct.
Be prepared to double-check your information by having a superior knowledge about The Constitution for the United States of America and especially The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America, the foundation for all our constitutions.
#IgnoranceOfTheLaw is a perfect #Excuse of the #SupremeLawOfTheLand if you are a #Judge #Lawyer #Legislator or #Police when all of them and others will tell you that Ignorance of the Law is no excuse, in the same breath, they will violate The Supreme Law of the Land by accusing you of violating an unconstitutional law that the officer KNOWS is unconstitutional --- because -- IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE -- unless you are a dishonest or ignorant-of-the-law cop, lawyer, judge, legislator, etc.
One US #SS officer told me that it was not his duty to know whether or not a law violates the constitution. The person he falsely accuses can fight it out in court for the rest of their lives, if they can afford it.
Another SS-officer told me that I must be far more flexible regarding the content of the #Constitution. To which I told him that Article 5 of the US Constitution allows the officer all the flexibility in the world --- so long as he has already obtained a Constitutional Amendment to authorize that flexability.
What do they all have in common?
This morning (Oct 4, 2019, just before 0600; I walked by a priest sprinkling #HolyWater toward #PoliceCars #PoliceDogs and #PoliceOfficers who were #US #SS police officers.
I learned that this is an annual #exercise which may actually be an annual #exorcise
The question I asked about it was whether they put some #Constitution in that holy water; because the US SS do not get it from anyone other than myself.
Religion is nothing but #superstition and if our police rely on superstition, they ought to get a #RiskFree job at some burger-joint.
Do not get me wrong. If the officer want to practice that #VooDoo crap out of uniform, so be it. But it does not belong in any united States American public-government forum.
Far too many government employees act like there is a #ConflictOfInterest between their #Duties and the #Constitution
If there exists any "conflict", it is the officer's actions that are criminal.
Key Word = INDIVIDUAL
An article in #TheWallStreetJournal Sep 28-29, 2019 talks about IRAs and how some have been setting them up to pass #TaxFree in some instances to #children and #grandchildren which seems to bypass the INDIVIDUAL part of the 'I' in Ira.
I have just a couple words to you #JosephFolk and others --- Waaaaa Waaaaa Waaaa
What part of INDIVIDUAL in the name INDIVIDUAL Retirement Account even remotely hints that you can even include children or grandchildren?
Get a grip.
Every Long-Term financial plan should include the changing tided of unjust governments that WILL, when they deem it "necessary"; to take gold, silver, cash, businesses, homes, and other investments from people with their #unconstitutional laws.
Long-Term Financial Planning that passes from generation to generation should include HOW TO SAVE and increase one's own wealth. It should never be that of relying on the wealth of others.
Are the #rich just now figuring out that they too cannot trust the government?
#MrSlott seems to be blind to the fact that #Congress has been #screwing everybody they can, every chance they get. You, just happen to be next on their list. When they get done screwing the rich, whose next?
I'm here to tell you that I am here (as a nearly penniless homeless man) help you protect your wealth against unjust government. This website contains that information that you can use, and you do not have to credit me for you use.
Why is it so difficult to see our own #wrongs
About "What Litterers Tell Themselves"; "[I]t is often impossible to get people to acknowledge their own wrongdoings..."
In the same issue of the WSJ there was an article about Thomas Jefferson, having penned "All men are created equal" but he himself (before and after) continued to own slaves.
Having lived in LAfayette Square/Park in DC since July 9th last year; I've had the pleasure and displeasure of meeting many a "protester". The two most memorable is that of CodePink and Evangilist Melody Cromby US Presidential Candidate. Both are known for their truly excessive volume with notoriously small groups of listeners.
Both have proclaimed two reasons for their excessive volumes: (1) Others are just as loud or louder. (2) I have the 1st Amendment right.
What both of them (and many others; sometimes myself included) fails or refuse to comprehend; is that in public spaces, other people also have Rights protected by Amendment 9. For example, the right to not have to listen to EXCESSIVE Volume.
If a protester uses a volume that can be heard in the entire park, and they have almost no other people than those of the protest itself; that volume is excessive--especially for those who do not want to hear it.
Thus, decibel-laws or anti-noise-laws can be enforced in accord with Amendment 9. The anti-noise laws cannot prohibit others from saying what they desire, but it can curb the volume at which they do speak.
The negative about Amendment 9 rights that are not specifically listed; is that government officials will, as they already have, overstep those constitutional limitations of power, without US Constitutional, Article 5, and/or Amendment 10 granted powers.
In short. Those Excessive-Noise Laws must attain Article 5 Amendment authorization to also help protect the rights of people, who, in public places, wish to not have their ears blasted with excessive noise. Thus, the amendment to free-speech would set a decibel-limit on volume, while not touching the content of the speech.
Best way to use #OnlineReviews
Check out only the worst reviews.
If you decide that you can live with the product, knowing about the worst things people write about it; you cannot go wrong.
If the product proves to not be as bad as the reviews; consider yourself to have made a great purchase.
If the product proves to be as bad as the worst reviews; consider yourself to have been duly informed.
Pelosi about passing #unconstitutional #GunLaws and #ImpeachingTrump