Time for Action !!
These posts result from what I read in a variety of "news" media, conversations, etc.
#DCStatehood would set an awful precedent
Can you imagine that Kansas City MO and Kansas City KS want to become states?
Maryland and Virginia allowed portions of their respective states to be used for our nation's Seat of Government. Neither, that land nor the citizens of their respective states ceased to belong to their respective states.
All that means is that the city(s) of Washington, DC/MD and Washington, DC/VA should have two separate City Governments. One for the Maryland 1/2 and one for the Virginia 1/2 of Washington DC.
The fact that people mistakenly assumed that (and treated) accordingly that the states forfeit that land and allowed our nation's government to suppress the voice of so many citizens for so long can easily be solved:
Wow, that was simple.
Death by #RaiseTheWage #MinimumWage
#SupplyAndDemand should be the rule when it comes to setting the cost of labor. That is what the Uniform Code of Naturalization and Immigration is supposed to accomplish.
When the government artificially establishes a minimum wage, businesses simply add that cost to the products and services they sell/provide. Have you ever wondered why a loaf of bread and gallon of milk cost so much more today than they did 75 years earlier?
The average US wage in 1910 was 22 cents per hour.
A loaf of bread: 7 cents [3.14 loaves of bread/hour]
Seems that with The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, the U.S. minimum wage was initially set at $0.25 per hour
The average US wage in 2019 averages $7.25 dollars per hour.
Bread priced at $2.50 in 2019 [2.09 loaves of bread/hour]
Seems as though we get less for our money as the minimum wage increases.
Immigration and Naturalization, supposedly controlled by Congress, is supposed to only allow immigrants into these united States to increase the number of jobs when our employment rate is high, by encouraging people with valid businesses and the resources to finance its startup or relocation to come in. When businesses legitimately need workers to fill empty jobs; Congress then sends out requests to friendly countries for those with the skills needed for those jobs. in this way, the ration of jobs to citizens to work them always favors the citizen.
When government allows a glut of people from other countries to enter these united States legally or worse yet, illegally, the supply of labor goes sky-high and the people coming over the borders (generally willing to work rock-bottom wages) allow businesses to lay off and fire those they pay higher wages.
When the government artificially inflates the the wage-cost to businesses the businesses actually increase the cost of their products and services in a never-ending battle to maintain profits -- all the while, the works keep getting screwed over.
Sic Semper Tyrannis: Thus ever unto tyrants
According to the Virginia State Motto; every politician who violates either The Constitution for the United States of America and/or The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia should be put to death. The State-Seal shows a soldier standing over a Tyrant with blood oozing from a wound over the heart. Truly a fitting end to tyrants and despots.
Question is: How guilty are politicians in the State of Virginia regarding the charges of Tyranny?
Let's go with just three simple examples of constitutional violations:
All of these are prohibited by The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America and The Constitution for the United States of America.
From The Declaration:
From The US Constitution:
It, I suppose it too bad that the people of Virginia lost sight of that motto. But, probably for the better. Especially since humans tend to immortalize and elevate to the status of "god" even those politicians they hate the most -- particularly if those politicians were #assassinated.
What The Constitution for the United States of America really tells us about emoluments.
From The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 1, Section 9, it states; "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State."
From Article 2, Section 1, it states "The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them."
Perhaps I missed it, but did Congress authorize a recent President, in 2009, to accept the Nobel Peace Prize from Norway? If Congress did not authorize it, this certainly could have been a violation.
A 1785 common-use dictionary defines "Emolument. Profit; advantage."
According to Article 2, this would not apply to any foreign State or possession of these united States, but only to any of the Domestic States that is a member of these united States of America. With respect to foreign leaders staying in one of Mr. Trump's hotels; the courts properly ruled.
However, dealing also with Article 1 applies to all government officers, within and for these united States of America. With respect to Article 1, any foreign leaders staying in one of Mr. Trump's hotels; the courts incorrectly ruled. When foreign leader stay at a hotel, other people from that country are more likely to try to stay at that hotel, because it lends more credibility, publicity, and more financial receipts/profits. This would be the same as if I owned a Mom & Pop hotel and a famous actor, athlete, etc. stayed there. More people are likely to book reservation and stay, simply because someone famous also did. Thus the advantage gained.
If inept relates to job skill and knowledge; what's the conflict?
If inept; properly defined as "having or showing no skill; clumsy" is what #UKambassador meant by an inept White House; he must feel that truth is something to be ashamed about.
Mr. Trump, as President of "The United States of America" demonstrates a clumsy manor about his skill (rather lack thereof) regarding his constitutional duties of office. Thus, inept.
@REALDONALDTRUMP Mr. Trump should (as I find myself trying to do with my own advice) heed his own advice. "An executive is only as good as his gatekeepers" Mr. Trump, Apprentice show.
His gatekeepers include the Secret Service officers around the White House who do not allow or pass information along to Mr. Trump that would have helped him do a much better job as President of "The United States of America". Additionally, other gatekeepers include the advisers of whom he surrounds himself. His "constitutional" adviser is as incompetent and lacking when it comes to The Constitution for the United States of America, as is the entire Supreme Court of "The United States of America". Case in point, the #census.
See previous posts about the unconstitutional census.
A Pro-Trump supporter?
If you are a pro-Trump supporter; and you would like to see and help him fulfill most of his Constitutional Campaign Promises in a very big and peaceable manner, get word to Mr. Trump, President of "The United States of America" concerning these Constitutional Executive Orders that include the best ways to carry them out. Constitutional Executive Orders.
Do the humans who own #Facebook #Google #Twitter exercise their right to sway politics to their favor, or do they violate their contracts with their users?
Face it Mr. Trump; @REALDONALDTRUMP the "social media" outlets fall under the same Constitutional protections of Freedom of the Press as does any newspaper, TV, radio, etc. publication or individual. With all your money and wealthy-friends among your contact, why do you not create a truly unbiased impartial social media operation that allows people to equally gripe about you as well as those who offer their praise and worship. Could you handle that, or would you then become as those you disfavor and begin regulating those who do not fall in line with your political agenda?
Personally, I do not like people or corporations that present themselves as impartial and unbiased all-the-while censoring and silencing the voices of those who oppose the outlet's personal or corporate political agenda. However much I do not personally like it, I must defend their right to use their outlets to advance their political and/or religious agenda -- so long as it is in accord with the terms of the contracts they present to their users.
Legislating from the Bench is nothing new to The Supreme Court of "The United States of America".
@SCOTUS Converted the Act if UnAffordable Care into a Tax. Now they look to rewriting our nation's Immigration and Naturalization Laws/Code? This should not surprise anyone. After all, SCOTUS should have heavily penalized all parties (President, lower-court judges and lawyers) responsible for allowing such a frivolous case to waste taxpayer dollars.
Our governments have gotten so far out of our present control, we must RE-EDUCATE ourselves with respect to how we are supposed to properly control our government's powers. That is the purpose of this website CleanHonestGov.com.
Welfare is still welfare even when you change to class or recipient
It does not matter if you decrease one class of recipients (the poor) and double-down the dollar-amount given to fewer richer people as political payola. #CorporateWelfare is just as bad as poverty welfare. It still creates unjust dependence on other people's money. It also is a power The Constitution for the United States of America does not grant, and should be entirely stopped.
@REALDONALDTRUMP All animals, humans included, tend to favor the path of least resistance. Only when a person desires, or circumstances force them to fend for themselves - only then does the individual fend for themselves - or perish. End all government-given welfare individuals businesses, and countries.
A census by any other name, is still an unconstitutional census
As #epochtimes quotes "Knowing the information is vital to formulating sound public policy. President Donald Trump"
@REALDONALDTRUMP The is absolutely no constitutional reason for you to know how many of any particular class of people are in these united States of America. Not for taxation, because Amendment 16 prohibits such use. Not for any other purpose because Equality under the Law also prohibits such use as every government project, program, and law must equally apply and be available to everyone. That is why nearly every government project, program, law, agency, department, and office within our governments violate The Constitution for the United States of America and should be discontinued.
What the President, Congress, and Supreme Court need to bring all of their constitutional violation up to date requires is a string of Article 5 Constitutional Amendments, the entirety of which the people will not authorize. That is why they never even tried.
#Equality in sports
Seems there is confusion in the schools. Men and women, boys and girls are supposed to be treated equally. When it comes to sports, there should be absolutely no male or female teams -- just a team (soccer, football, baseball, basketball, etc.) Then, only the best athlete, whether male or female gets selected for that team.
This way it will not matter whether or not the athlete was born male but identifies female or the other way around.
When we start seeing and treating each other as equals, regardless of each other's choices, we begin protecting each other's rights.
In the workplace, most pay should not be based on hourly compensation but piece- work. Whether male, female, trans, bi, etc; whoever produces an established number of units work gets paid a specified dollar-value.
A Trusted #Lexicographer can, for those who are not aware, change the terms of various binding contracts and laws
When a binding contract is written that may pass from generation to generation, it is important to know what those words meat to the most people party to that contract ---whether they personally sign it or sign it via a representative.
Using more modern dictionaries, especially several generations separated from those who originally contracted the document, may come to conclusions quite contrary to what the actual terms intended, simply by applying the ever-changing definitions to the fixed terms of a contract.
Several cases in point:
It's said that a picture paints 1,000 words. Just make certain that you know which definitions were actually painted.
The #Supreme Law of the Land
The most important thing about any law is not its #enforcement but that it is constitutionally authorized. Only then is its enforcement important -- but only if it is #equally enforced on friend and foe alike.
Worst aspects about most laws have two faces:
With absolutely every ticket, and trial of a crime, the Law is supposed to be tried FIRST to determine if it violates the Supreme Law of the Land. If it does,
If a jury determines that the law is in fact constitutionally authorized, only then can the accused person be brought to trial to try the Facts; which determines if in fact the accused person violated that constitutional law.
Attorney General Barr claims there is a legal path to add #citizenship question to the 2020 #census
There is Mr. Barr.
If you actually read the Constitution, I'll bet you swore oath to defend; that process would include all of the following and in this order:
We, the governed people of these united States of America should be terrified that our #President and US Supreme Court judges act as though they have NEVER READ The Constitution for the United States of America
#WhiteHouse uses #Religion to Review Human Rights
In short, this is an unlawful way to undermine our nation's Founding Charter, The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America. To redefine unalienable rights, this will require ABSOLUTELY EVERY STATE IN THE union to ratify it.
It is an unconstitutional way for government to STEAL more unjust powers by dictating to us what rights we may exercise.
This unconstitutional commission, according to some, will include about 10 members ALL FROM RELIGIONS of various flavors. The leader having long relationships with the Vatican.
How Earth's general climate works to force planet-wide animal and human migrations
An enclosed spinning sphere, such as Earth....
O.K. An explanation before I continue.
Earth is an enclosed sphere. The enclosure is called gravity (at least for this post). In other posts, that enclosure might include the O-Zone, etc.
The Gravity enclosure tends to keep Earth in a relatively "smooth" sphere (at least so as we are taught). The faster a sphere spins with a reasonably flexible enclosure, the more of its fluid mass migrates to the outer circumference. Thus centrifugal force. The longer this happens the flatter the Earth tends to get.
As Earth warms from NATURAL causes and migrations throughout our Solar System, the Galaxy, and the Universe, we approach other space areas that heat and cool our Earth. Science has already proved all this, but they do not yet see it.
Earth contains life at present that thrives in -80 degree temperatures and in above +150 degree temperatures. Temperature/Climate changes (be they cooler or warmer) favor the one and not the other. It causes one to grow bigger and more populous. Thus, survival of the fittest.
As Earth naturally warms, the Polar Ice Caps melt, uncovering land mass. As the ice melts, the liquids now migrate towards the Equator, flooding equatorial land masses, exposing polar land masses.
The Equator life that is able to migrate (including humans) move towards the Poles. Massive wars escalate because the comfortable land-mass is small. Once most of the human population exterminated themselves via war; a "global" peace is reached for a period of time.
As millennia pass along, the poles begin icing up again and force warmer-life to once again migrate towards the equator. As the oceans begin freezing, mobile-life walks across the oceans as if it were land.
And thus the cycles of Earth's Climate. If we want to survive without the massive population-control wars, we should build massive floating cities with Iceberg technology. That is; where about 3/4 of these cities are underwater and 1/4 or so above water. Just a thought. We have the knowledge, skill and resources.
People feeling uncomfortable around police
When the people begin feeling uncomfortable around police who generally are well protected against criminal prosecutions is a symptom of how corrupt our governments have become.
Speaking from personal experience and having questioned many police (Secret Service, Metropolitan, Park, Sheriffs, Deputies, State, as well as Military) I have not yet found one who will risk his job to honestly defend The Constitution for the United States of America against enemies Foreign and Domestic.
To be totally correct and honest:
My questions are really simple. The first one almost always gets the expected "correct" response. The second and/or third have always proved that the officer lied on the first and does not care about our rights so long as they get their pay check.
Question One: If you were given an order to obey or a law to enforce that violates The Constitution for the United States of America, which details The Supreme Law of the Land, will you obey the order and.or enforce the law?
Unanimously, the response is "No." They claim they would not enforce or obey anything that violates the US Constitution.
Double-Check Question/s: If you were guarding a public/government building and saw someone you did not know and could not prove they were a government official coming into public building; would you arrest them?
Unanimously, the response is "Yes." This is evidence that they lied to the previous question.
Other similar question work to also prove a lie to the first.
Evidence of the lie come with the provable fact that The constitution for the United States of America has not yet been lawfully amended in accord with Article 5 to alter the content and meaning of Amendment 2, and Article 6.
If we the people no longer respect the Constitution and do not enforce its RULE OF LAW upon our politicians -- they have and will continue to corrupt our nation and government.
We are beginning to resemble Hitler's regime where people began fearing their police.
One United States Secret Service Officer put his possession in these words:
It is my job to obey the orders given to me and to enforce the laws put before me; and let the courts settle it our." Frank
In other words Frank told me that he does not give a damn about our rights or the Constitution, so long as he gets paid. He does not care how long or how much it costs a person to fight his constitutional violations in court, so long as he gets paid.
That, unfortunately, is the common attitude among far too many people in uniform (police and military), as well as, especially the lower-level judges and legislators.
This will only improve in our favor when WE THE PEOPLE begin holding our government employees feet to the fire of THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND (form the cities and towns to our nation's government).
If Ignorance of the Law is no excuse for us when violating a government law -- A government employee's Ignorance of the Supreme Law of the Land is #TREASONOUS; so says The Constitution for the United States of America and The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America.
Who owes what to whom?
Only those who were unjustly held in slave labor would be subject to reparations -- but only against those specific individuals who unjustly held them in slavery.
It unjustly rewards those who did not suffer the unjust slavery and unjustly punishes those who did not unjustly hold anyone in slavery.
Additionally, any person claiming reparations who wants to remain in these united States of America becomes ineligible because they most likely would never have been in these united States of America had ancestors not been enslaved here; which means that the person seeking reparations has benefited by being a united States citizen and has already been #compensated.
Anyone who receives reparation must then best #deported to the country of origin.
Just a thought
#Transportation Department relaxes #Trucker Drive-Time
The Transportation Department has no legislative authority. Its #regulations must be viewed solely as suggestions -- not as enforceable law.
In order for those regulations to be nationally enforceable law, The Constitution for the United States of America, must authorize Congress to legislate how long a person can drive at one time. We know this from Article 6, as well as Amendments 9 &10 & 14.
Those #drivetime laws must then apply to non-commercial motorist in order to qualify for equal protection under the law.
SCOTUS authorizes Amendment 4 Violation
It does not surprise me that the #SCOTUS ruled that un-warranted search and seizure of an accident victims blood does not violate Amendment 4; especially when you take into account that the US Constitution does not allow a Census to be taken, but the SCOTUS rules favorably for the unconstitutional census anyhow.
Taking anything from the conscious or unconscious accident victim without a warrant violates Amendments 4, and 5.
It violates Amendment 4 because it demands a warrant to search and or seize any thing or person. If the person is unconscious or conscious and gets to the hospital and needs a blood sample for treatment, this is a different animal. That treatment may need to know what is in the blood system (drugs, alcohol, medicines, etc.) At which time, the police, prosecutors, courts need to issue a warrant to get that information from the hospital.
It violates Amendment 5 because it forces a person to be a witness against themselves.
Florida admits that their prison system failed
The entire purpose behind The Constitution for the United States of America, Amendment 13 to to have the duly convicted person pay restitution for their crimes.
When Amendment 13 is properly applied by honest government officers, the prison system totally pays its own way. Not one cent comes from taxpayers.
The crime of incorrect #genderpronoun
This comes as the result of my picking up trash in Lafayette Square, Park in Washington DC.
I found a name tag. The noun on the tag states, "Emma".
Nothing unusual about that. It would have gone unnoticed and quickly discarded as trash someone left on the ground.
What caught my eye was what was written below the name. The pronouns "She/her"..
Even this might not have been terribly noticeable, had it not been for several days earlier that someone told me that some state passed a law that made it a crime to "miss-pronoun a person".
The country/nation that is properly identified as the united States of America got way off-track early in our life; about 1785 or so.
This is similar to #hatecrimes. Tell me, how many crimes are committed against other people out of love?
Every real crime against another person or their property deals with some level of dislike/hate.
If we expect our government officers to be honest with us -- we must protect the sovereignty of OUR unified vote as a body of Registered Voters.
More than a decade before the #demolition of the #TwinTowers, various science channels and programs documented the deliberate demolition of tall buildings. They also covered the topic of how precise the timing of the explosion must be to get the buildings to drop in their foundation's footprint.
The slightest of miscalculations can destroy neighboring buildings.
My very first thought when I finally saw the video of the Twin Tower's demolition was that "this was a deliberately planned demolition". A thought solely based on the experts from years prior, thanks to science and salvage shows.
When we allow our government officials -- our employees -- to keep secrets from us for any longer than one election cycle, we doom ourselves to massive corruptions and cover-ups of treasonous prosecutions. The value of which disappears when the "truth" of such events gets declassified -- ONLY AFTER -- the guilty parties have long since died.
Mr. Trump: Pull up your Big-Boy shorts. You are President of "The United States of America". Act like it! CleanHonestGov.com can help you improve these united States of America, eliminating your 3-year headaches with #ConstitutionalExecutiveOrders.
Is President Trump unpresidential?
Mr. Trump is President of "The United States of America".
He certainly doe snot act like any of our recent known presidents. For the most part, that is the best thing he has going for him. I personally he that he is neither better nor worse than other presidents.
In one regard, Mr. Trump is fully equal to all prior presidents. He is as fully ignorant about the scope of the powers the Office of President of "The United States of America" wields. Make that two ways he's as "presidential" as other presidents. He does not know how to select people constitutionally knowledgeable to help him do a better job.