The Problem with the #aclu

From the ACLU reproduction of The #Constitution of the United States of America (pocket booklet)

Page 43: "Women won the right to vote only in August that year [1920]"

Women have always possessed the right to vote. Amendment 19 proves this fact:

• "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex."

The right of citizens to vote... shall not be violated or abridged... on account of sex.

Women always possessed the right. Amendment 19 expressly prohibits government from violating that right.

----------------------

Page 45: among other issues, it states, "..expanding our privacy rights in the digital age."

Amendment 4 already covers the digital age when it states:

• "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects..."

The 1785 definition for EFFECTS:

• "[In the plural.] Goods; moveables."

​
By definition, goods and movables include computer, phones, cars, etc./ anything you own that is not real estate.

----------------------

There are several other points... but that is sufficient to question their qualifications.

If not, consider why the ACLU refuses to take a case that can prove that our government (city, county, state, federal) routinely suppress anywhere from 60% to 80% of all registered voters, non-consent votes at every election/polling.

I present this in light of this paragraph from Page 45:

• "Since we can't take on every worthy case, we select lawsuits that will have the greatest impact, cases that have the potential for breaking new ground and establishing new precedents that will strengthen American freedoms."

I would think that making certain every registered voter's vote gets properly counted would accomplish that task. But it requires the ACLU to work outside their EASY-comfortable-zone.