How Reading Comprehension & Math Stop Political Corruption
How Reading Comprehension & Math Stop Political Corruption
Includes The Designed Vote-Count System
Stopping Government Corruption — Easier Than Imagined
So far, from the page What are Governments, we see how governments are corporations and how The Declaration and The US Constitution respectively represent the Corporate Founding Charter and Corporate By-Laws. Each Charter has a specific purpose.
The Declaration and The Constitution become reading and math story problems to Solve for Voter-Eligibility and Vote–Count, as well as find solutions to end political corruption.
The Declaration is Reading Comprehension with respect to...
...what kinds of power we may of right grant to our governments.
...what powers we must never allow our governments to exercise.
...warning signs of corruption.
...our nation's pledge to each other.
...our nation's total foreign policy (war / peace, and trade).
...limitations on representative's power.
...our rights and duty when our government officers violate our Constitutional By-Laws.
...how our votes are supposed to be counted.
...how to recognize when any person or government act must be stopped and / or removed and corrected.
...as well as much more as discussed in The unanimous Declaration, the dissection.
The Declaration is Mathematics as it pertains to counting our votes.
The Constitution is a reading comprehension story problem regarding our government's powers and recognizing when any government officer violates those granted powers or exercised powers not granted.
Both, reading and math require Elementary Research to figure out what the words meant to the generation at the time the documents were first signed; especially touching on voter-eligibility and vote-count system. We do not concern ourselves with the practice at that time, but with the planned design, as written into the Charter contracts.
The reason we are not concerned with their practices in the 1700's and 1800's, or even today, has to do with this warning within The unanimous Declaration. A warning that the signers and citizens of those generations have not yet learned.
The Warning:
[...]all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
Those in government, as well as many citizens, were more familiar with and accustomed to the evils of their government and social practice than they were with the unknowns of the new design they contracted in The unanimous Declaration. Unfortunately, they continued the evils of their practices and ignored the righting of a people by working the design.
PHRASEOLOGY
Reading comprehension has a lot to do with the way a phrase is worded, which tells the reader a lot: Mostly, by the words used Others, by what is not written Then, by the definitions of the words used as defined at the time used.
For example: the way a phrase is worded tells the reader a lot. This phrase from The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, states: "Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed" — This is the consent of the governed phrase vote-count method, which could have been written either of the following two ways —but wasn't. Either of these two are often used to describe our present-practiced vote-counting system as either a plurality and / or first past the post:
...Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the majority of those registered voters who check in at the polls. This is simplified first past the post.
...Or... Governments get their just powers by simply getting one more registered voter's consenting vote than the next closest opposition. This is a simple plurality.
The Vote Count Methods page provides greater detail about the three vote-counting methods of plurality, first past the post, and consent of the governed.
THE FIRING — RECALL
The vast majority of registered voters — regardless of personal differences and dislikes for one another — Did NOT and Do NOT consent to most of the politicians who are unlawfully and unethically sworn into office; violating the terms of the contract called The Declaration.
"Vote Them Out" = Fire Them = RECALL Elections
"Vote Them Out" & Fire Them ≠ General Elections.
Waiting for the next General Election rewards politicians whose term ENDS AUTOMATICALLY then anyhow. That is the purpose for the General Election — fill the seat that is about to empty.
RECALL Elections are the only way for the people to FIRE corrupt politicians and to STOP their damage.
It's long past due for us to FIRE most all of our government officials that we did not even hire/elect in the first place.
Review Total Recall Campaign, as well as the Undo Unjust Government Acts pages for some great ideas and tools about how to get the job of Clean Honest Government done all at once.
The Importance of the Voter Registration and Voter Check–In / Check-Out LISTS
The Voter Registration and The Voter Check–In or Check-Out Lists are among the most important elements for getting Clean Honest Government and to Old Math with respect to calculating whether or not an item or candidate on the ballot passes with enough consenting votes or fails for lack of consent.
Absolutely every Registered Voter, does in fact vote every time a ballot goes out in their district. We know this because The Declaration states that government gets its honorable power from "the CONSENT of the governed". This creates a default non–consent voter position; sort of like an automatic none of the above that you do not have to actually mark.
How does this work
Nearly every political jurisdiction in these united States of America has a known number of registered voters.
In order to get the consent from that known body, the balloted item must be the first one past a specific post or marker. That marker is, at the very least, 50% of the total number of registered voters.
Specifically, the balloted item or candidate that first gets 50%+1 of the total number of registered voters to consent — wins.
Whatever or whomever is on the ballot that does not get that 50%+1 of the total number of registered voters consenting votes —must fail for lack of consent.
This also qualifies as PLURALITY's definition number 4. "The greater number; the majority." [emphasis added] This 5 minute animated video...
...(also shown on the home page) details the designed process ad benefits.