Blame this face's owner for this website's content presentation.
Credit for the content itself belongs to the 1776 Generation. ---by Tony K
|
I'm either building the cocoon or I am busting out of it.
This is mostly what I look like in the winter months.
--- by Deweydog Photo
|
- In Person = Best Bet. Over 98% of my days are either
- in Lafayette Square, Washington DC/Maryland
- 24 hours a day (Tue, Wed, Thr; Sat, Sun) except when jailed.
- Mon. & Fri
- I'm in #Potbelly Sandwich Shop at corner of 17th Street & Pennsylvania Ave. (usually Mondays & Fridays by 7 am., until about 5 pm.
- After Potbelly's, I'm back in Lafayette Park
- in Lafayette Square, Washington DC/Maryland
- danielmkingery@gmail.com email = checked about 2 times a week while at Potbelly's
- (202) 246-9698 phone = rarely on; checked maybe once or twice a day until battery goes dead. Otherwise Mon. & Fri while charging batteries at Potbelly's
End of Content
A Respectful Demonstration By Geoffrey Nimmich gnimmich@yahoo.com
Below: Photos of Geoff and signs at White House, Washington, DC.
TAKING CARE OF THE NATION’S VETERANS
When it comes to supporting our Veterans, it should not matter whether you are a liberal, conservative, Republican, Democrat, Independent or completely nonpolitical. We should all unite in providing for our freedom protectors. Maybe you can join this peaceful demonstration for 5, 10 or 30 minutes; show your support. Our show of support for Veterans addresses three issues: 1) in some cases, retired veterans must fund, from their retirement, the amount authorized for a service related disability; 2) the discouraging manner that VA Benefits processes, handles and pays disability; 3) numbers reflecting the factual cost of fully supporting our Veterans. Many questions, some answers and a growing need to do the right thing.
COMBINED RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY PAY
In 2004 Congress passed a bill (CRDP) changing the laws concerning concurrent payment of retirement pay and service related disability pay. Prior to this law an eligible retiree had to choose their retirement pay OR authorized disability pay; although both were “earned” they could not receive both. This law changed policy in a positive direction. It did not go far enough. It provided relief to retired veterans that possessed a VA disability rating of 50% or more but left those with a disability rating of less than 50% forced to continue funding their own disability. Any person who serves for over 20 years in the military absolutely deserves their earned pension. (A member of Congress must only serve 4 years to get a life-long pension.) If during the time of that service, the member is injured and disabled in a service related manner, they should receive appropriate compensation too. Current law allows the retiree to receive their earned retirement and disability if the disability reaches a certain level. But retirees with lower disability ratings effectively lose their well-deserved benefits since it is deducted from their well-earned retirement. Those funds are tax free, a benefit worth maybe $200 a year, but that is almost insulting. The erosion of benefits has been severe. An individual joining the service in 1970, after serving 20 years honorably, was promised FREE life-long financial support for him/herself and a surviving spouse. The same for medical, dental and eye care. Those benefits were taken away, the retiree now pays for those promised benefits. And, certain retirees must fund their own disability. Some members of Congress want to repeal the 2004 law and return to telling our Veterans they must choose which of their fully earned benefits they wish to receive. These represent broken promises to our freedom protectors
VA BENEFITS: HANDLING CLAIMS
While the numbers fluctuate regularly, about 90,000 benefit claims are being processed, every day. The average time to process a claim is over 125 days. That average tends to cover the truth. Once a claim is submitted, an initial review is conducted and in many cases the veteran is asked to submit additional proof to support the claim. It is very important to point out that the computer systems for VA benefits and VA health care are NOT linked. The veteran is forced to access medical records on a very non-user-friendly health care system. They must search to find the appropriate health care record, print it and then submit it to the VA. This causes further delay. Once benefits has all the demanded information they often have to schedule independent evaluations. It is not unusual for it to take 4 to 5 months for benefits just to process and schedule those evaluation requests. A contracted company makes the appointments and contracted providers conduct the evaluations. This might help create independent evaluations but adds additional costs. The lack of common sense and cost control is evident. After benefits receives those independent evaluations further review is conducted often resulting in further evaluations some of which are redundant. Benefits is only interested in the answers they want not necessary the truth. Finally, it is reviewed, and a decision is mailed to the veteran. Yes, it is MAILED. VA Benefits refuses to use phone calls or secured email; VA Health Care uses all modern communication tools constantly. Mailing allows Benefits to further cause unnecessary delay. It is important to emphasize the delays at every point. Facts support that by delaying decisions, VA Benefits hopes that the veteran might just give up or die before they pay a benefit. The average 125 days stated herein is proffered by VA Benefits. History reports thousands of cases where the projected claim resolution is constantly pushed out to first 180 days then 270 days and can creep beyond 365 days. After that maybe never. Many veterans state the moto of Benefits is delay, delay, deny and deny. Is this how we should treat our freedom protectors? These men and women, and their families sacrificed greatly. They deserve better from all their fellow citizens.
SOME NUMBERS
Relevant numbers fluctuate greatly and result in much discussion, below are the available:
There are 22 million living veterans, 6.7 % of our 327 million population ever wore a uniform
There are 2.2 million serving today, only 0.67% of our current population and we need more
There are 2.2 military retirees living today, thousands are over 65 years of age
3.4 million veterans receive service connected disability, 15% over 70% disabled
1 million retirees have disability ratings of which approximately 150,000 are rated over70%
The 2004 CRDP law, deciding which retirees can receive both retirement and disability pay impacts primarily those with disability ratings under 50%; approximately 400,000. While pay for each level of disability varies, the annual expense of those not included in CRDP is about 2.4 billion dollars annually. That is 0.06% of our 4.17 trillion dollars 2017 budget. There is a movement in Congress to repeal CRDP and again force veteran to choose retirement or disability pay. They claim eliminating all CRDP would save 10 billion dollars a year, 2.4% of annual our annual budget. Congress seems willing to take more away from our deserving veterans while including 7.8 billion dollars of earmarks in that same 2017 budget. One earmark alone was “8 million dollars for an aquatic plant control program.” Does that really deserve the same priority as our disabled veterans? Last year our country spent more money taking care of illegal immigrants than on all aspects of veteran benefits. How many of you think our veterans deserve to be the #1 priority?
OUR ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY
Considering these facts maybe you can join this peaceful demonstration. Just 5, 10 or 30 minutes would show your support for the protectors of our freedom. This is not a political issue. This is just living up to promises made to those citizens who honored us by protecting our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
| va_protest.rtf |
|
|
Contact Info
"Daniel Kingery" <danielmkingery@gmail.com>
(202) 246-9698
leave message at either
End of Content
Would you like to donate?
What our nation needs most are People. People to talk about the cause for Clean Honest Government.
Your best contribution is yoursef. People go to the polls — not money. Money does not win this type of campaign.
Person to person contact wins a successful campaign to improve our nation and get Clean Honest Government.
Help Improve the CleanHonestGov.com Content
- Full-Service Publishers
- Copy Editors
- Proof Readers
- Illustrators
- Animators
- Marketing & Promotions
- Sales & Distribution
End of Content
Right to Reproduce Content
What Clean Honest Government really needs are people... Lots of people... Word-of-Mouth People... — You type people!
You posses the right to reproduce/copy all this material and pass it around. Do not rely on the overly censored mass- and social-media companies to make it easy. It is not pirating when I give you permission.
Make the content your own. Keep talking it up. Keep spreading it around. Once you make the content your own; you need no one else's permission.
End of Content
About text, video, dictionary snapshots, content and layout
Snapshots are mostly of 1756 and 1785 dictionaries, digitized by The National Archives.
Videos simply put the text and snapshots into a mosty verbal content; mostly for people who would rather listen than read.
Text is not yet inteded to be a complete transcript of the video or dictrionary snapshots.
Content, the plan is to keep it short and on target. Likely to take me several attempts.
Layout, the plan is to keep the flow in such manner as to flow from the necessary first steps to completing the desired action-plan to eliminate corruption from out government.
End of Content
Why content differs from what's commonly taught
The shortest reply to this is because the content within is restricted to the actual text of the documents detailed and to that of common-use dictionaries that existed as close to and just prior to the signing of those documents.
This method gets as close to the original meaning, as to what the content meant to the most people of that signing-generation.
Original Meaning must be the correct process because each of the documents contain amendment provisions to keep them up to date with the changing times. This should remove the temptation to misinterpret the content from the hands the documents govern.
Our teachers, unfortunately, tell us that we are supposed to let our government official, especially the judges tell us what those documents are supposed to mean today; as opposed to what they meant to the generation at the time they were ratified.
Where this content differs most is because we the people are to blame. Too many others blame the government, politicians, media, big business, religion, and others for corruption in government. Not here.
In this work, we, the people, are solely to blame for the path we allow our government officers to take our nation and our government.
End of Content
Content easily adapts to work for people of all countries
Though specific to these united States of America, this content easily adapts for people anywhere on Earth.
We must see our governments as entities we own and control.
Later sections identify the designed CONTEXT — PERSPECTIVE — Corporate Documents — The People's Rights relationship with Government Powers.
All governments originally start out protecting their people's rights. When left unchecked; those governments become tyrannical.
Video: Content good for any country
End of Content
Total Recall Campaign
The purpose for this work is to get and keep us all, at the same time, working from the same plans, the same design, the same....
Read more
Owner's Manual: How to Get & Keep Clean Honest Government.
Video:Being On the Same Page
Video-Intro to: The Total Recall Campaign
End of Content
A GLOSSARY for Original Meaning --- BUILD NOTE: Build Glossary from FILE: GLOSSARY Sortable Table that works
For the sake of original meaning, we must work from the definitions to words according to what they meant at the time used. This Glossary easily sorts according to Order Used or Alphabetically.
Welcome to the Original Meanings Time Machine from 1756 & 1785
Read more
BUILD NOTE: Replace the part after \images/ with the NAME of the image. AND, replace the part after alt=" with the same NAME.
| Snapshot Image | ||
|---|---|---|
| 001 | CORPORATION |  |
| 002 | POLITICKS |  |
| 003 | accurately |  |
End of Content
We must know that we can get and keep Clean Honest Government — Or there's little reason to try to get it
Enforceable Proof exists: We already have the numbers!
Read more: Enforceable
When vote-counters and media broadcast that only 20% to 40% of the total number of registered voters checked in at the polls (early, absentee, in-person, etc.); this is great news for well-informed, patriotic united States Americans.
That information tells us that 60% to 80% of the total number of registered voters did not-consent to anything or anyone on that ballot; thus failing for lack of consent.
The concept of majority of the total cannot be repeated enough. The contract-document from which we work is titled, The unanimous Declaration of the [then thirteen and now fifty] united States of America. The entire purpoose for these united States of America divorcing from Great Britain is political corruption. We must continue in such a way to make political corruption as difficult as possible to get in and stay in government.
The unanimous Declaration is the document from which to start. To define words from that document, we examine a 1756 dictionary, first, of all things, the definition for CORPORATION.
For purposes at this point, we simply look at the first three words:
CORPORATION. A body politick,
CORPORATION: Snapshot Image
The connection happens when we define POLITICKS.
POLITICKS. The science of government; the art or practice of administering publick affairs.
POLITICKS: Snapshot Image
When we view our governments as the corporate structures they are, it simplifies matters. The unanimous Declaration is The Corporate Charter. At present, The Constitution for the United States of America is The Corporate By-Laws.
With respect to voting; the Corporate Charter regulates voting among those who own and control that corporation — not the By-Laws. The By-Laws work to stop theft and/or abuse of powers, which is what we see in our present US Constitution.
The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America tells us how our governments get their honorable powers:
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
This introduces, consent.
"CONSENT. 1. The act of yeilding or consenting. 2 Concord; agreement; accord. 4. Tendency to one point."
"To CONSENT. 1. To be of the same mind; to agree. 2. To co-operate to the same end."
CONSENT: Snapshot Image
Frequently, people use plurality to describe our vote-count. Since applied to a 1776 contract, The unanimous Decaration, we define plurality from 1756.
"PLURALITY. 1. The state of being or having a greater number. 2. A number more than one. 4. The greater number; the majority."
PLURAITY: Snapshot Image
To get the consent of a known body of people (registered voters in this instance); the majority of that known body must agree to the same thing or person. If not, that body of people have not consented. With that, only plurality definition #4 applies. The greater number; the majority.
Let's wake our sleeping giant of 60% to 80% of the total number of registered voters who have not consented to the present corruption of government officers.
We already have the numbers!
End of Content
Waking The Sleeping Giant
Read more: Waking
Just one person makes all the difference.
Passing this information to others — and suggest corrections to improve content, gets more people talking and doing more to stop government corruption.
Over 60% of the total number of registered voters already agree. All we have to do is inform them that they have the strongest gripe about how their non-consent votes not being counted.
With this knowledge; a 30-day goal is doable.
This is grassroots working.
Forget mass- and social-media. The strongest advertising is word of mouth.
The charts below show us just how quickly this can spread among us if we simply spread this to everyone we know who complains about bad government. We complete this project by electing those candidates who get the consenting votes from the majority of the total number of registered voters.
The numbers at work. Do we?
With as many people who complain about bad government; this is cake-walk. But, we all know that not all who complain will act. The actual number of days may be longer or shorter. It all depends on the will of the people.
If we do nothing this day our problems just gets worse, much worse for us and the next generations; until someone finally puts stop to it.
The folowing Table shows how quickly we can work; when unified.
30-Day Table
Day
Total People
1
1
2
2
3
4
4
8
5
16
6
32
7
64
8
128
9
256
10
512
11
1,024
12
2,048
13
4,096
14
8,192
15
16,384
16
32,768
17
65,536
18
131,072
19
262,144
20
524,288
21
1,048,576
22
2,097,152
23
4,194,304
24
8,388,608
25
16,77,216
26
33,554,432
27
67,108,864
28
134,217,728
29
268,435,456
30
536,870,912
We see that the theory is perfect for the 30-day objective.
We know that with the 60% to 80% of total number of registered voters not consenting to most of our politicians; we already have the required majority.
The required element for successful completion is the will of the people to risk some temporary discomfort to stop corruption in our government for long-term rewards; not just for us but for generations on the way.
End of Content
For the Present Generation
My apology and dedication to this generation
Read more: Apology
I'm sorry my generation failed to keep proper control over our governments. We had "good" teachers (our parents and such) who taught us how to blame previous generations. After all, we did not create this mess; why should we do anything to correct it? Right?
Wrong!
It's past time to step up and grab our government by the balls and tell them that this generation controls our government.
We must take responsibility for our government and act our part as owners of government.
My parents did teach that when I know enough to complain about how bad something is — I know enough to start repairing the damage done and make it right.
With that, I hope this content helps you right our fallen nation and to correct our government's ills by informing you about how we are supposed to properly control our governments.
Previous generations suffered the same political ills. Proof resides in The unanimous Declaration of the [then thirteen and now fifty] united States of America.
Question is: What are we going to do in this generation to correct our political troubles?
Video: Apology & Dedication
Video: More disposed to suffer
End of Content
Younger than 18 voting rights violates!
Read more: Younger
When we stand unified for this cause; we stop our government from violating the rights of younger tax-paying united States American. This is how we stopped government from violating the voting rights of women and people of color.
We (not just females or not just people of color) unified for that purpose.
As a citizen, if you pay any form of taxation (sales tax, income tax, inheritance tax, any kind of tax) you lawfully possess the right the right to vote in these united States of America.
Proof comes from The unanimous Declaration, with this grievance against Tyranny, "For Taxing us without our consent."
That's correct, consent.
If the government, by its laws, claim you are competent enough and old enough to pay sales tax, for example, and requires you to pay sales tax; the government declares you old enough and competent enough to vote to help determine how your tax dollars get used by government and who gets elected into office.
Consider these points from The Constitution for the United States of America:
- For government to regulate any of our rights, the US Constitution must grant that power to governments. Amendments 9 & 10.
- We have not granted to government the power to regulate our voting rights.
- In several instances, we have whittled away at government corruption against our rights by stopping the government from infringing upon our voting-rights for people of color, sex, and somewhat on age.
- The Constitution for the United States of America does not authorize government limit or infringe upon the voting rights of any citizen. Therefore, any citizen, no matter how young; if taxed, must be allowed to register as a voter. The only lawful deterrent to this is that of the parent/guardian authorization. The youth can get around this limitation by emancipating themselves if they can prove that they have and can support themselves.
The government either must stop taxing people younger than age 18 OR — the government must allow them to vote, if they are taxed.
You possess all the evidence you need; that as long as you are a citizen and you pay any form of taxation — You possess every ethical right to vote.
If you wonder whether people younger than 18 have enough wisdom to select a good candidate; consider some "adult" reasons for choice;
- That one looks better on TV (Kennedy v. Nixon)
- My family has voted this way for generations, so I will.
- I like a winner, so I will vote for the one ahead in the polls.
Video: Under age 18 voting
Video: Younger than 18 voting
End of Content
Motto: Unified Diversity
Read more: Motto
Unity increases strength
Diversity increases survivability
End of Content
Getting It Done in 30 days or less
The First Person
Read more
This First Person is the one who recognizes something is wrong within the government; the work of a government official, or the official themselves.
Proper recognition is critical; we must base the recognition on provable Declaration and/or Constitutional facts and content; not our personal desires for or biases against a specif person in government.
This starts with knowing our rights and knowing the limits on our government's power.
End of Content
Know Our Rights
Read more
Because of where I reside; this specifically details for these united States of America — but easily adapts for people elsewhere.
One of the worst ways to learn, but certain ways to know what rights you possess is to watch the laws passed that limit or otherwise prohibit some human activity. Those laws limit one of our rights that the US Constitution, Amendment 9 address and puts off limits for government to limit or deny to us. Amendment 9 states"
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
If the US Constitution does not specifically authorize government to infringe upon that right; it is off imits to government (city, county, state, nation, UN, etc.) We know this, because every one of those legeslators swear oath to the US Constitution. In corporate terms, this is the Corporate By-Laws to control government powers.
The unanimous Declaration of the [then thirteen, now fifty] united States of America is a binding contract among all united States Americans with respect to what kinds of powers we actually can grant to our governments and how our votes are supposed to be counted. In corporate terms, this contract is the Corporate Charter. It is the contract among the people responsible for owning and controlling our government.
When properly comprehended, The unanimous Declaration tells us that our list of rights are unlimited:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
For emphasis: among these.
If you can dream up a right (which is simply nothing more than an action) that you value, it too is unalienable. For instance: We have the unalienable Right to Sleep, the Right to Vote, and so forth.
If one person stakes claim to a right — any right — we all possess that same right. Not that all of us choose the same rights from that list of rights, but it does not nullify any rights not chosen or not easily exercised.
As seen earlier, The Constitution for the United States of America, Amendment 9 also tells us that our list of rights are not limited.
The Constitution does not grant to us any rights. When one of our rights is listed, there almost always is a political restriction against the government from infringing upon that right; or the Constitution grants to the government very-limited power of infringement upon that right for the purpose of administering justice.
Amendment 4 allows very limited infringement into our Right to Privacy.
Amendment 2 strictly strips the government of any power to limit or regulate what kinds of weapons a person can own and/or carry and/or where they can or cannot carry them in public places.
Amendment 19 stops government from continuing to exercise an ungranted power.
Amendment 6 shows us that as a society, we may prohibit the exercise of certain rights. We constitutionally prohibit the trial of any criminal prosecution to be decided by a judge. If this or any future generation wants to change that — we certainly can amend the Constitution.
Many other examples appear in the US Constitution.
End of Content
Know the Limits On Government Power
Read more
From the same two contracts (The Declaration and our nation's Constitution) we learn the limits on the powers our government can of right exercise. Both contracts bind their respective parties.
The unanimous Declaration of the [then thirteen, now fifty] united States of America binds all united States Americans with respect to what sort of powers we can contractually grant to our governments (whether city, town, county, state, or nation). It also details precisely the way to account for every registered-voter's vote.
That total voting body includes absolutely every person registered as a voter — whether or not they check in at the polling station. The unanimous Declaration speaks for itself.
[U]nalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed
Our governments get their honorable powers from the consent of the governed. The key word is consent. Consent requires a question and response system. Thus the polling or voting process.
People who qualify to vote and then register to have their vote properly counted determines the body from which that consent must be attained.
Consent is nothing more than a simple meeting of the minds. There won't likely be a unanimous meeting of minds. The absolute least for which we should strive is the consent of 50% + one of the total number of registered voters.
A simple majority of the total number of registered voters.
Since the contract that binds all registered voters is that of their consent, any registered voter who does not get their consenting-vote to the polling station on time; either by early, absentee, in person, or otherwise; their vote must be counted as having not consented — because they did not consent.
This is no attempt to read minds or even the intent of the registered voter. This only is a mode by which to determine how many people actually consented, and whether or not that number passes the 50% mark of the total body of registered voters. That is all.
We were never intended to allow corruption to go unchallenged, unanswered, and undone. It is our duty to stop it as soon as we find it.
As for The Constitution for the United States of America, Amendment 10 it repeats that same concept when it states:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
When any government officer exercises any power that The Constitution for the United States of America does not specifically grant to government — their violation of the US Constitution is, by definition of war against the body of registered voters and all other citizens, an act the US Constitution, Article 3, Section 3 defines as Treason:
From a 1785 dictionary, "WAR. 1.War may be defined the exercise of violence under sovereign command against withstanders; force, authority, and resistance, being the essential parts thereof. 5. Hostility; state of opposition; act of opposition."
War: 1785 Dictionary Snapshot
From a 1785 dictionary, "WITHSTANDER. An opponent; resisting power."
Withstander: 1785 Dictionary Snapshot
The US Constitution is the first opponent or wall of resistance against unjust power. The Declaration would be the second opponent or wall of resistance. Then it comes down to the individual accused of such actions. Finally, it comes down to whether or not there are enough citizens to help protect the accused person's rights against unjust powers.
The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 3, Section 3 defines Treason as:
Treason against the united States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort..."
Not to worry. Simply because we may vote people into office, we have not granted to them the authority to do any thing that violates the US Constitution, or that goes contrary to The Declaration. We only deliver that grant of authority to the government through the US Constitutional, Article 5, Amendment process — so long as that power does not violate The Decaration.
Amendment 10 ends by telling us that the states may of right exercise those powers that the US Constitution does not expressly prohibit to the states to exercise. However, in accord with The unanimous Declaration, it also requires the people of the respective political jurisdiction (city, county, state, nation) to grant that power to that government office. This means that any right not mentioned specifically in the US Constitution shall not be infringed, denied, and/or disparaged. That right is off limits not just to our nation's government, but also to the state, county, and city/town government levels as well.
Additionally, The unanimous Declaration lists nearly 30 political powers that are off limits to all our government officers from exercising. For them to exercise even one of those prohibited powers is an act of tyranny, which translates into an act of treason.
End of Content
Know what powers we can, by contract, grant to government
Read more
The unanimous Declaration provides that information:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
This is a three-step process in which all three must be satisfied.
- Does the proposed candidate or other item that wants ballot access work to protect all of our rights equally?
- If not — it should never be put on the ballot.
- Can any person exercise the proposed political power against another without unjustly violating their rights?
- If not — it should never be put on the ballot.
- Only after the proposed candidate or other item satisfies both the previous elements — only then may it go to the ballot. Not that it should; but it may.
- Once on the ballot, it must receive the consenting votes from the majority of the total number of registered voters in that jurisdiction; or — It must fail for lack of consent!
For our vote-counters to count our votes in any different manner it amounts to acts of treason against the Sovereign Body (the body of total body of registered voters) by giving aid and comfort to our political enemies who did not attain the required consent of the governed to take office.
Any political power violating any of the above is not lawfully enforceable. It is our duty, when we learn of them, to put them down as soon as possible. This keeps corruption from spreading.
End of Content
Know How Our Votes Are Supposed to Be Counted
Read more
As detailed above; The unanimous Declaration's, consent of the governed, along with the definitions for consent (detailed earlier), it requires that the majority of the total body of registered voters physically must consent to the balloted item or candidate — or it fails for lack of consent.
End of Content
You Found Problems Within Government. What's At Risk?
Read more
With the information in this website, it is easier to recognize political corruption when we see it.
What are you willing to put at risk to solve the political ills you notice?
I am not telling you that you absolutely will lose any or all of what you are willing to put at risk. The question is simply for your own reference point as to what you are willing to risk to protect your rights, which are our rights, freedoms, and duties when it comes to properly controlling our governments.
Keeping your answer to that question in mind; I introduce to you our nation's true pledge that was ratified in 1776 with the contract/law that binds all united States Americans together in this respect. It states:
[F]or the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
The entire purpose for The unanimous Declaration is the preservation and security of all of our rights equally. All that means is that if I see your rights are unjustly attacked — it is my duty to help you protect your rights. In so doing, my rights are as equally secure as yours. This is a tough one,on which I still sharpen in my own life.
It does not matter whether I like you or hate you. It matters not whether or not I agree with your choice of the rights you exercise; so long as you do not unjustly violate other people's rights.
If you violate other people's rights — I am duty bound to assist the other person, even if you are my best friend, family member, etc.
End of Content
Inform Others About the Problem
Read more
The person whose rights are attacked may not even recognize that fact. They may figure that one person cannot win — so they do nothing. They may have become too accustomed to the political evils to notice how their government violates their rights.
Let them know you are there to help protect their rights and to help get other people informed about the trouble.
Talk with others who seen most likely to assist and work your way along the list.
Formulate a written plan of action that details the political abuse and the solution sought.
Get as many people to sign it — not as a suggestion to government officials — but as your plan of action as the unified body of the Sovereign Authority, which is the majority of the total number of registered voters over your government, which is in accord with The unanimous Declaration of the [then thirteen, now fifty]united States of America.
THE ORDER given to the government officers should possess certified signatures from the majority of the total number of registered voters and other citizen-residents — consenting to the required action stated in THE ORDER.
THE ORDER should include:
- That the signers act in accord with their Sovereign Authority detailed in The unanimous Declaration of [then thirteen, now fifty] united States of America.
- The problem being identified and the government office / officer / personnel responsible.
- The remedy sought, such as:
- repeal a law
- fire an employee / recall an elected officer
- repair or maintain certain public areas
- etc.
- Provide a reasonable time frame for completion — if the time delay does not otherwise make things worse;
- Remove the government person immediately and bind them over for trial, if their action is serious enough to justify punishment and restitution.
- Be prepared for resistance from the elected officers responsible for managing the common affairs involved. At present, and unfortunately so, they are likely leading law enforcement and/or military. Sadly, also and unfortunately so, police and military blindly follow orders to protect their paycheck over the people's rights.
- Be also prepared to remove all necessary government officers whose job it is but do not work to correct the problem.
- Remain unified with as diverse a group as possible. Unity adds strength and visibility. Diversity increase the odds of surviving any setbacks or attacks to character, criminal accusations, etc. offered up by the government officer in question.
- If recalling an officer, and if desired to replace the person in office — have that new person on board and ready to take office the day enough signatures are attained. Otherwise, the office can be left empty — especially if no longer needed.
All of this will help you inform others by:
- Identifying the problem
- Presenting a solution
- And detailing the written plan of action
End of Content
Follow Through
Read more
Once the previous items are complete, follow through.
Failure to follow through emboldens the government officers to not take you seriously. When they do not take us seriously, they respond with increased injuries and violations against our rights, our property, and our persons. We see this warning fron The Declation:
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
This is why we cannot treat our actions as "suggestions" but as The Supreme Law of the Land; punishable as treason.
Following through sends the message to our government employees (elected, appointed, hired, volunteering, and contracted) that the people truly control our government.
End of Content
Keep Teaching Others
Read more
If we fail to teach others of this generation and future generations how to properly control our governments, they will end up in just as bad or a worse situation in the future.
Teach a person what to learn — and you must keep teaching them new material.
Teach a person HOW to learn — and they will teach themselves everything they need to know when they want to know it.
Teach a person how to teach others HOW to lean; and HOW to teach others how to teach others how to learn — you teach many future generations.
End of Content
The Encouraging News
Read more
Be encouraged.
Even though, at the beginning, progress seems slow; with just a little more time, momentum builds to the point it looks like everyone was already on board and working for this objective.
This is The Law of Numbers:
The longer people talk about a project, the more the people recall hearing about it. The more people hear about it, the more likely they are to give it serious thought. The more they hear others talking good things about it, the more likely they also will help promote it. Then, it begins looking like this has been the norm forever.
End of Content
Our Nation's Pledge: Life, Fortune, Honor
Our Fallen Nation
Read more
It truly is sad when what used to be a FREE Country converted bavk into despotism and tyranny right under the people's noses. The present generation still declares our "freedoms"; which are over 10 TIMES more oppressed than what our founding generation suffered in 1776.
Evidence? You seek Proof?
Consider that it was a 3% tax in 1776. Today, our average to low-end tax-rate is about 30%.
In a run for 6th-grade Class President; popularity won the race.
Popularity still wins "adult" political races. So much for substance and the wisdom with age.
The people of these united States of America never saw it coming. As of this day (11/08/2019) very few people even recognize our governments as the tyrants and despots and traitors they are. If I do my job correctly, this content will help you easily recognize a tyranny, despotism, and traitor within our governments.
With CleanHonestGov.com I hope to improve our political condition; right our failed nation; and restructure our presently tyrannical, despotic and treasonous governments to secure our rights (see The unanimous Declaration of the [then thirteen, now fifty] united States of America), (see The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 3, Section 3).
This is where you come in. I cannot, nor should I, even if I could, do it alone.
Video: Tyrants by any other name
TYRANNICIDE. "The act of killing a tyrant."
Tyrannicide Definition Screenshot
Question is: How do you kill a tyrant without becoming just another tyrant?
That is exactly what happened within these united States of America. We merely replaced a tyrant 3,000 miles away with 3,000 tyrants one mile away.
The goal is to replace the corrupted form of government and the politicians within it, with a better idea and better plan to finally put into action the original design and plan for our nation and our governments. For the first time in our nation's history, without acting like the tyrants we remove from office.
End of Content
Our Nation's True Pledge To Each Other — and Its Meaning
Read more
From The unanimous Declaration of the [then thirteen, now fifty] united States of America, last lines, it states:
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our fortunes, and our sacred Honor.
The entire purpose of The unanimous Declaration is that of the equal security of all of our rights — not mine over yours or ours over theirs. All this means is that as a united States American, if I see your rights are unjustly attacked; it is my sworn duty, as a united States American, to come to your aid to defend your rights and especially so if I do not like you. With this, I also secure the protection of my own rights — because your rights and mine are identical.
This does not tell us that we must lose any of that which we put at risk. But we must be willing to put all that we are and possess at risk in order to secure our rights. The longer we allow our governments to get out of our control the more likely the loss when we do finally act.
Our losses are certain when we do nothing. Government will tax us to death — consuming our life and our fortunes; also, destroying the value of our Honor (reputation).
The government will pass laws that destroy the value of your good name, your sacred honor, when you violate those unconstitutional laws. The government will try you as a criminal for having donenothing but exercise one of your rights, which violates an unconstitutional law, itself being the worst criminal by violating The Supreme Law of the Land; detailed in The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 6.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
End of Content
Establishing Proper Original Meaning & Perspective
That was the quick intro. Here, we get into more details and more definitions.
The relationship: People's Rights and Government Power
The only Lawful manner by which our governments obtain our authority to infringe upon any of our rights that are not enumerated in The Constitution for the United States of America is to go through the Article 5 Amendment Process.
Otherwise, their unjust laws are acts of Treason, Article 3, Section 3. This is proved by the following content on Context, Perspective, and Key Documents.
Our nation's documents are clear on the relationship between the people's rights and the government's power. The government's purpose is to help secure our rights. Thus: Our rights are superior to government powers, until such time we constitutionally authorize our governments some limited power to infringe upon that right.
End of Content
Context
From a 2019 Internet dictionary, it defines context as: the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood and assessed.
From 1756, it defines context as: The general series of a discourse.
Context: Dictionary Snapshot
From what setting or idea brought about our nation's documents (The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America and The Constitution for the United States of America)?
Keeping in mind that their intent was to reduce the ease by which political corruption might enter our government offices, as well as provide a way by which the people could easily remove that corruption when it enters government. This statement from The unanimous Declaration verifies this concept:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
With that, we continue; keeping a balance between those two limits; the difficulty by which government gets its just powers vs. the ease by which the people can stop political corruption. The balance should favor the ease by which the people can stop the corruption.
Context: Video
End of Content
Perspective
From a 2019 Internet dictionary, it defines perspective as: a particular attitude toward or way of regarding something; a point of view.
From 1756: "A glass through which things are viewed. Relating to the science of vision, optic, optical."
PERSPECTIVE: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
PERSPECTIVE: Video
From what attitude or through what glass should we view our nation's documents (The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America and The Constitution for the United States of America)?
For the correct answer, we view the 1756 definition for CORPORATION. "A body politick, authorized to have a common seal, one head or more, able by their common consent, to grant or receive in law, any thing within the compass of their charter: even as one man." The bold, added for emphasis.
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Then, we define POLITICKS, also from the 1756 dictionary: "The science of Government; the art or practice of administering publick affairs."
POLITICKS: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Governments are political bodies, therefore Corporations, by definition.
We should look at our nation's documents as the binding Corporate contracts they are:
- The Corporate Charter, The unanimous Declaration, binds all citizens together with respect to how we are supposed to properly control our governments' power.
- The Corporate By-Laws,The Constitution for the United States of America, is a binding contract between the citizens generally and our government officials.
These are corporate contracts, that form the basis of our Rule of Law within these united States of America (the nation).
End of Content
Two Key Corporate Documents
The Corporate Charter (Founding Charter)
With respect to our governments, this charter is called The unanimous Declaration of the [then thirteen, now fifty] united States of America; also known by its popularized and less fitting name of The Declaration of Independence.
This Charter details the ownership responsibilities, voting, the Purpose for the Government-Corporation, how to modify this Corporate Charter, as well as when and how to recognize the need to modify and / or replace the By-Laws.
The Corporate By-Laws
In government terms, this is a constitution. At present, our nation's constitution is The Constitution for the United States of America.
The By-Laws simply detail the duties of the key offices of that corporation, how the corporate officer's votes get counted, some internal checks and balances, how to fill vacant or soon to be vacant position, how to amend the By-Laws, among other useful information.
Video: Two Key Corporate Ducuments
End of Content
The People's Rights — vs — The Government's Powers
Exercise and retaining our rights always comes first.
There are several way we know this as fact.
- Have people been exercising that right (such as; have people been doing that act that does not unjustly violate the rights of others) before the law was passed to infringe, deny, or disparage that act?
- If so, that right, that act is protected as OFF LIMITS to government to pass any law limiting, denying, disparaging, or infringing upon that act/right until the government gets a constitutional amendment authorizing government infringement into that right to some limited degree and purpose.
Our grant-of-power to our governments, with respect to how we might allow our governments to infringe upon any of our rights and why, always comes after the fact.
After what fact? The fact that more and more members of our society begin violating other people's rights and / or property, which may or may not include the use of new technology.
US Constitution, Amendment 9, states, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people"; tells us two things:
- The government can pass laws to help protect our rights that are not enumerated within the US Constitution;
- BUT, it cannot pass laws to "protect" one right while violating another right that is not enumerated.
Within CleanHonestGov.com the individual learns not only how to identify our rights but also how to recognize when any person in government violates any of those rights.
Video: Our Right vs. Government's Powers
End of Content
Step-By-Step: Putting the Plan into Action
From the 1st Person to Continued Control
The First Person
This First Person is the one who recognizes something is wrong within the government, the work of a government official, or the official themselves.
Proper recognition is critical; we must base the recognition on provable Declaration and/or Constitutional facts and content; not our personal desires or biases against a specific person in government.
This starts with knowing our rights and knowing the limits on our government's power.
Video: The First Person
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Know how to identify our rights
Human Rights are the same the world round (for flat); our rights are identical.
The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America is a binding contract among all united States Americans with respect to what kinds of powers we can of right grant to our governments and how our votes are supposed to be counted.
The unanimous Declaration tells us that our list of rights are unlimited:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
For emphasis: Among these....
If you can dream up a right (which is simply nothing more than an action) that you consider as equally important as any of those three listed — it too is unalienable. For instance: We have the unalienable Right to Sleep, the Right to Vote, and so forth.
If one person stakes claim to a right — any right — we all possess that same right. Not that all of us choose to exercise the same rights from that list, but it does not nullify any rights not chosen or not easily exercised.
The Constitution for the United States of America, Amendment 9 also tells us that our list of rights are not limited:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The Constitution does not grant to us any rights. The Constitution is the tool by which we control our government's powers.
Video: Know our Rights
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Know the limits to our government's power
We learn the limits on our government's powers from the same two contracts (The Declaration and our nation's Constitution).
The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America binds all united States Americans with respect to what kinds of powers we may of right contractually grant to our governments (whether city, town, county, state, or nation). It also details how to account for every registered-voter's vote.
That total voting body includes absolutely every person registered as a voter — whether or not they check in at the polling station. The unanimous Declaration speaks for itself.
— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed
Our governments get their honorable powers from the consent of the governed. The key word is consent. Consent requires a question and response system. Thus the polling or voting process. See the 1756 dictionary snapshot of CONSENT: "1. The act of yielding or consenting. 2 Concord; agreement; accord." and To CONSENT: "To be of the same mind; to agree. 2. To co-operate to the same end."
CONSENT, To CONSENT: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
People who qualify to vote, and then register as a voter, have a vote that must be properly accounted for, as consent or not-consenting. It is the majority of that total body of registered voters (city, county, state, national) who determine the body from which consent must be attained.
Consent is nothing more than a simple meeting of the minds. There won't likely be a unanimous meeting of minds. The absolute least for which we should strive is the consent of 50% + one of the total number of registered voters. This establishes the "post" as in first past the post, at the 50% mark of the total number of registered voters.
A simple majority of the total number of registered voters.
The contract of The unanimous Declaration binds all registered voters to requirement of consent. Any registered voter who does not get their consenting-vote to the polling station on time; either by early, absentee, or in person; their vote must be accounted for as having not consented — because they did not consent.
This is not an attempt to read minds or even the intent of the registered voter. This only is a mode by which to determine how many people actually consented, and whether or not that number passes the 50% mark/post of the total body of registered voters. That is all.
We were never intended to allow corruption to go unchallenged, unanswered, and uncorrected. It is our duty to stop it as soon as we find it, as soon as we muster enough supporting votes.
As for The Constitution for the United States of America, Amendment 10, it repeats that same concept when it states:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
When any government officer exercises any power that The Constitution for the United States of America does not specifically grant to to government — their violation of the US Constitution is, by definition, of war against the body of registered voters and all other citizens; an act the US Constitution, Article 3, Section 3 defines as Treason:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
Simply because we may vote a person into office, we have not granted to any government officer the authority to do any thing that violates the US Constitution.
Amendment 10 ends by telling us that the states may of right exercise those powers that the US Constitution does not expressly prohibit to the states to exercise. However, in accord with The unanimous Declaration, it also requires the people of the respective political jurisdiction (city, county, state) to granted that power to that government office. This means that any right not mentioned specifically in the US Constitution shall not be infringed, denied, and/or disparaged by any government officer. Those right are off limits not just to our nation's government, but also to the state, county, and city/town government levels as well.
Additionally, The unanimous Declaration lists nearly 30 political powers that are off limits to all our government officers. For them to exercise even one of those prohibited powers is an act of tyranny, which translates into an act of treason.
TYRANT, TYRANNY: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Our best resource to identify a tyrant or tyranny is through the list of grievances in The unanim ous Declaration of the united States of America.
At present, our government vote-counters; that is, vote-counters who abide by government imposed vote-counting regulations count our votes in accord with the PLURALITY definitions 1 and 2. See snapshot.
PLURALITY: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Counting to just "more than one" over anything or anyone else on the ballot for the same spot does not qualify as CONSENT or To CONSENT definitions of "an agreement; tendency to one point; of the same mind; cooperating to the same end"; detailed earlier.
The only PLURALITY definition that fits along with CONSENT is 4. The greater number; the majority.
When the majority of registered voters; by not checking in at the polling station, have not consented; the meeting of the minds is against everyone and everything that is on the ballot.
Not going to the polling station is a form of NOT-consenting.
Non-consent is a valid and countable vote.
Not going to the polling station is not the same as not-voting. Not registering as a voter is the equal of not voting.
Video: Know the limits on government power
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Know what powers we may of right grant to government
Knowing what powers we can grant to government. This really is simple. The unanimous Declaration provides that information:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
This is a three-step process in which all three steps must be satisfied.
- Does the proposed candidate or other item that wants ballot access work to protect all of our rights equally? If not — it should never be put on the ballot.
- Can any person exercise the proposed political power against another without unjustly violating their rights? If not — it should never be put on the ballot.
- Only after the proposed candidate or other item satisfies both the previous elements — only then may it go to the ballot. Not that it should; but it may.
- Once on the ballot, it must receive the consenting votes from the majority of the total number of registered voters in that jurisdiction.
- If it does not get the majority of the total number of registered voters' consent — It must fail for lack of consent!
For our vote-counters to count our votes in any different manner it amounts to acts of treason against the Sovereign Body (the body of total registered voters) by giving aid and comfort to our political enemies who did not attain the required consent of the governed.
Any political power violating any of the above-three criteria is not lawfully enforceable. It is our duty, when we learn of them, to put them down as soon as we possibly can.
- This keeps corruption from spreading.
- This keeps us from becoming accustomed to that political corruption.
- This keeps us from passing on those political ills to future generations.
Video: Know what powers we may of right grant
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Know how our votes are supposed to be counted
Knowing how our votes are supposed to be counted is critical. As detailed above; The unanimous Declaration's, consent of the governed, along with the definitions for consent, it requires that the majority of the total body of registered voters must physically consent to the balloted item or candidate — or it fails for lack of consent.
The method of vote-counting, detailed in The unanimous Declaration:
Government derive their just powers from the consent of the governed.
Since election and voting is often compared to horse races; such as first past the post and such phrases; let's run a three-scenario horse race:
- Before the race starts; we have a known finish/winning point, which may be 1/4 mile, 1/2 mile, or maybe 20 laps around the track. This way, we know that whichever horse completes that known objective first — WINS!
- Before the race, we start with the same known-post as in #1 above; but as the race develops, During The Race that post moves to unknowable locations until such time someone declares the race is over.
- Then, we have a horse race where no one knows where the finish line is going to be at the start of the race; but the winner will be determined at some predetermined time-frame.
The race described in #1 above is how The unanimous Declaration set the rules of the race:
- A known fixed winning point, past which the successful balloted item or candidate must pass.
- That known point is 50% of the total number of registered voters.
- The first to pass the 50% mark wins (regardless of time-frame of the race), because no other in the race can even get to the 50% mark, once the first passes it.
The race of #2 starts with the same known finish point of 50% of the total number; however, as the race deadline approaches and passes, that finish-line moves to make a shorter race, fudging the race results.
- Maybe, only 40% of the total number of registered votes checked in at the polls (early-, absentee-, or in-person-ballot) by the time the race is declared over. At this point, since none of those on the ballot could have passed the 50% post of the total number of voters; everything and everyone on the ballot is supposed to fail for lack of consent. Thus NO WINNERS in that race. The seat is supposed to go vacant until such time the majority of registered voters find a candidate they agree should fill that office.
- However, corruption moves that post towards the new 50% mark of those who cast a (generally-consenting) ballot. At this point, one would expect that the winner must pass the 50% mark of that 40% who cast those genearlly consenting ballots. This is not true, which introduces us to the ever-moving post.
- What ends up happening is that the declared "winner" simply got one more vote than anything or anyone on the ballot.
In race #1; the before the race, known winning point; it is intended to keep as much corruption out of office by keeping easily corrupted individuals out of office. It keeps our standards high but not impossible.
In race #3, it makes it easy for corruption to get into office by eliminating nearly all standards to win an election.
- It eleiminates the majority of the total number of registered voters.
- It eleiminate the majority of those who cast a generally-consenting ballot.
- It reduces elections to simply one more vote, no matter how low the count.
Video: Know how to count our votes
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Finding and Repairing Problems in Government
With the information in this website, it is easier to recognize political corruption when we see it.
Question Is: What are you willing to put at risk to hopefully resolve the political ills you notice?
I am not telling you that you absolutely will lose any or all of what you are willing to put at risk. The question is simply for your own reference point as to what you are willing to risk to protect your rights, which are our rights, freedoms, and duties when it comes to properly controlling our governments.
The people in our military and police forces appear to put much at risk. Unfortunately that appearance is not a reality. If it were reality, our government officers would not be nearly as corrupted today as they have become.
Keeping your answer to that question in mind; I introduce to you our nation's true pledge that was ratified in 1776 with the contract / law that binds all united States Americans together in this respect. It states:
[F]or the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
The entire purpose for The unanimous Declaration is the preservation and security of all of our rights equally. All that means is that if I see that your rights are unjustly attacked (whether I like you or not, and especially if I do not like you) — it is my duty to help you protect your rights. In so doing, my rights are as equally secure as yours. I still work on this one myself.
It does not matter whether I like you or hate you. It matters not whether or not I agree with your choice of rights you exercise.
What does matter is whether or not you violate the rights of others while exercising that right. If you do ;mdash; I am duty bound to assist the other person, even if you are my best friend, family member, etc.
Video: Finding and repairing problems in government
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Tell others of the problem to get their help
When we see a problem in government, tell others in order to get their help stopping it.
The person whose rights are under attack may not even recognize that fact. They may figure that one person cannot win — so they do nothing. They may have become too accustomed to the political evils to notice how their government violates their rights.
Let them know you are there to help protect their rights and to help get other people informed about the trouble.
Talk with others who seen most likely to assist and work your way through the list.
Formulate a written plan of action. This is likely to be rather universal, simply altering the political violation to suit the need.
Get as many people to sign it — not as a suggestion to government officials, but as your plan of action as the Sovereign Authority (the unified body of the majority of registered voters and citizens) over your government, which is in accord with The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America.
THE ORDER given to the government officers should possess certified signatures from the majority of the total number of registered voters and other citizen-residents — consenting to the required action stated in THE ORDER.
THE ORDER should include the following elements:
- That the signers act in accord with their Sovereign Authority as detailed in The unanimous Declaration of [what are now the fifty] united States of America.
- The problem being identified and the government office, officer, or personnel responsible.
- The remedy sought, such as:
- repeal a law
- fire an employee
- recall an elected officer
- stop a contract
- repair or maintain certain public areas
- etc.
- Provide a reasonable time frame for completion — if the time delay does not otherwise make things worse; otherwise...
- Remove the government person immediately and bind them over for trial, if their action is deemed serious enough to justify punishment and restitution.
- Be prepared for resistance from the elected officers responsible for managing the common affairs involved. At present, and unfortunately so, they are likely leading law enforcement and/or military. Sadly, also and unfortunately so, police and military all to frequently do blindly follow orders to protect their paycheck over the people's rights.
- Be also prepared to remove all necessary government officers whose job it is but do not work to correct the problem.
- Remain unified with as diverse a group as possible. Unity adds strength and visibility. Diversity increase the odds of surviving any setbacks or attacks to character, false criminal accusations, etc. offered up by the government officer in question.
- If recalling an officer, and if desired to replace the person in office — have that new person on board and ready to take office as soon as the required signatures are verified. Otherwise, the office can be left empty — especially if no longer needed.
All of this will help you inform others by:
- Identifying the problem
- Presenting a solution
- And detailing the written plan of action.
Video: Tell others in order to get help
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Follow Thruogh
Once the previous items are complete, follow through.
Failure to follow through emboldens the government officers to not take us seriously. When they do not take us seriously, they respond with increased injuries and violations against our rights, our property, and our persons.
Following through sends the message to our government employees (elected, appointed, hired, volunteering, and contracted) that the people truly control our government.
Video: Follow Through
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Keep Teaching Other
If we fail to teach others of this- and future-generations how to properly control our governments, they will end up in just as bad or worse situation in the future.
Teach a person what to learn — and you must keep teaching them new material.
Teach a person HOW to learn — and they will teach themselves everything they need to know when they want to know it.
Teach a person how to teach others HOW to lean; and HOW to teach other how to teach others how to learn — and you teach many future generations.
Video: Keep Teaching Others
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Be encouraged.
At the beginning, progress seems slow; just a little more time momentum builds to the point it looks like everyone was already on board and working for this objective.
This is one of The Laws of Numbers: The longer people talk about a project, the more people recall hearing about it. The more people hear about it, the more likely they are to give it serious thought. The more they hear others talking good things about it, the more likely they also will help promote it. Then, it begins looking like this has been the norm forever.
Video: Be Encouraged
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enforcing Our Plan of Action
The Total Recall Campaign
Download a complete sample copy of The Total Recall Campaign
What is the Platform for The Total Recall Campaign
Although it still needs professional editing; I think it's good enough to start circulating. The Platform content in summary:
- Remove the entire US Presidential Administration. An employee who fails or simply refuses to deliver what was promised to get the job should be fired as soon as it appears they lost their will to deliver.
- Remove all politicians in elected offices who did not receive the consenting votes from the majority of the total number of registered voters in their district. This enfroces The unanimous Declaration vote-counting requirement of consent of the governed.
- Establish several government programs and projects that replace many of the unconstitutional government activities that solve:
- many environmental concerns
- provides clean renewable energy
- reduces unemployment
- establishes an individual financial security program
- reduces the growing crime rate (including unlawful entry into these united States of America)
- eliminat many of the massive election mishaps of the past
- convert the Military Industrial Complex to include useful Peace-Time projects
- convert the Prison Industrial Complex to include greater social benefits to society from people who violate the rights of others
- and more
- Completely rewrite our nation's constitution to solve and reduce the ease by which corruption enters our governments
The Total Recall Campaign Signature-Ballot is ready to circulate. The Printable PDF is below. It includes space for 1,000 Notarized, Registered-Voter, Checklist-Verified Signatures. It should be printed on 8.5"x14" paper. It is a total of 147 single-side sheets.
You may print additional copies for 1,000 Notarized, NOT-Yet-Registered-Voter, Checklist-Verified Signatures. Keep them separate for ease of counting, just in case some who intend to register, do not.
Your mission, should you choose to participate, is to circulate the Signature Ballot information and hold signing-stations where people can come and sign either the Registered-Voter or the NOT-Yet-Registered Voter Signature Ballot.
We submit that every High School graduate in these united States of America SHOULD have pass a comprehensive course on The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America and The Constitution for the United States of America.
Government officials are our employees; be they legislative, executive, and judicial; including police, sheriffs, military, etc.; they too should pass extensive testing on theDeclaration and Constitution before being placed on a ballot or being sworn into duty.
Introduction Video: The Total Recall Campaign
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
DOWNLOAD FILE FROM HERE The Total Recall Campaign pdf
It seems to work best when opened in a new tab.
End of Content
What's Needed for Improvement & Completion
A Full-Service Publisher with:
- Copy Editors
- Proof Readers
- Illustrators
- Animators
- Marketing/Promotions
- Sales/Distribution
Reliable Transportation:
- To get me around these united States of America for book & Ballot-Signings, seminars, workshops, and Conventions
Financing:
- This is included, just in case we are unable to find a complete-service publishing business that sees the need andmarket for this information.
- Funds are mostly generated through book sales and On-The-Spot Donations so that you will know how much comes in and where it goes.
- The How Much Comes In, is published prior to departing a location
- The Where It Goes, is published along the road as the expenses happen.
Travel Plan:
- Between today and December 23, 2019 (about 84 days)
- Invest about 2 days in every State and Territory of these united States of America
- about 2 different locations in each State getting Notary-Certified Consenting Ballot Signatures
- Signatures goal is 135,000,000+ (recognizing that all we have to do is organize the nearly 100,000,000 who already do not trust our present governments and have NOT Consented to most of the politicians in our elected offices.
Video: What's Needed
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
1756 & 1785 Dictionaries — by Samuel L. Johnsont
Click for the downloadable 1756 & 1785 dictionaries.
Thanks to The National Archives that digitized these dictionaries, I added them for your convenience, so you can see what these documents meant ot the most people of the signing generation.
The 1756 Dictionary in two volumes
1756 Dictionary Vol.#1
The 1785 Dictionary in two volumes
End of Content
Revising the US Presidential Electoral System
A Note About the Presidential Electoral System
Read more about the new Presidential Electoral System
Note on the Electoral System: The US Presidential Election is the only nationally elected office of our governments and should be a two-house election process; uniform throughout all states:
- The First House is the Popular Vote
- The Second House is the Electoral Vote
Each Congressional District should have only one electoral vote, with the candidate receiving the majority of the total number of registered voter's consenting votes in that Congressional District wins that one electoral vote for that Congressional District.
The candidate winning the majority of the total number of Congressional District's Electoral Vote becomes the successful candidate and the next US President.
This system requires that all candidates campaign in practically all Congressional Districts (not just the most numerous electoral or popular votes) in order to win the Second House votes.
If none of the candidates receive the majority of the total number of registered voter's consenting votes in any given congressional district; that Electoral Votes does not go to any of the candidates. If the majority of the total number of Electoral Votes are not awarded to any of the candidates on the ballot, all candidates must fail for lack of consent
Video: The New Presidential Electoral System
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
Citizens in Uniform (military and police)
Before Thanking Them:
Know what they did or did not do to protect The Constitution for the United States of America. (read more)
When I swore oath to The Constitution for the United States of America against enemies foreign and domestic; I did not fully comprehend the weight and power of that oath.
What you are about to read, is my not forgiving myself for my gross ignorance of the time.
When we, the people, so easily forgive our government officers for their political transgressions; we literally encourage them to get worse. We see this when our government officials lightly punish crime; we get more of it and worse.
In the past few years, I have been searching to find any truly honorable people who served in and may still serve in our government (military or otherwise). To date, as of a few months prior to today (Nov 8, 2019) I only found one person in the Navy who impressed me with the verbal knowledge that he truly would risk his neck to defend the people of this nation through The Constitution for the United States of America.
We think that just because a person gets sworn into office (police, military, or of the three head/branches of government) that they fully comprehend their oath of office and that they are honest people. Unfortunately, this rarely is true.
Yes. Nearly all people in government service are easy to get along with on their jobs — so long as you do not question their authority or their knowledge of the Constitution they swore oath to defend. I know. I've served more than a few sentences in a few different jails for not having committed any crime; but for being accused of violating a law that itself is a violation of the US Constitution. Most of the times there was never a trial, not even an arraignment by which to defend myself against the charges.
Several times, older folk who served in one of the World Wars or another war are quick to tell me that I HAVE THE RIGHTS I DO (such and such)....BECAUSE THEY FOUGHT IN A WAR OR SERVED IN THE MILITARY.
If that is true......
I must thank them, as I thank myself for allowing our governments to progressively and systematically trample the peoples' rights because of our gross ignorance about the Constitution we swore to serve.
So... Thank YOU; thank ME for violating the Constitution and for our part in violating YOUR RIGHTS!!! Not holding our politicians accountable to the Constituton.
Be very cautious about habitually thanking someone for their service in uniform. They may take it as your permission to keep trampling peoples' rights.
It does not matter whether they be military, police, lawmakers, judges, or executive officers; you may be unknowingly thanking them for trampling the very rights you thought they defended.
Video: Swearing in Oath — What it really means
Video: Before thanking a Veteram (military or police)
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
H3 level heading
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content
Enter H2 -heading level- text here otherwise take it out
Read more
Place your additional text here.
Enter Snaphot definitions as needed
CORPORATION: 1756 Dictionary Snapshot
Video code form YouTube
Re-Place this entire line with embed code from YouTube
End of Content