Do you KNOW how our votes are supposed to be counted? Can you prove it?
Have you ever heard of the vote-count method called: Consent of the Governed? Though all three concepts could describe the same election; any given election's vote-count practice may not be defined by all three methods. The next question may seem unnecessary, but it must be asked as well as correctly answered and proved. Does every person, registered as a voter; vote in every election? |
PHRASEOLOGY
Only the first two paragraph of this section are a repeat from How Reading & Math Stop Political Corruption; just in case you missed it,
The way a phrase is worded, tells the reader a lot:
The way a phrase is worded tells the reader a lot. This phrase from The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, states: "Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed" — This is the consent of the governed phrase vote-count method, which could have been written either of the following two ways, which are often used to describe our present-practiced vote-counting system as either a plurality or first past the post:
Regarding all three of these vote-count methods; First past the post, A simple plurality, and Consent of the Governed; we must know, with absolute certainty, whether or not every person who registers as a voter actually does vote or not. This is where the exact wording of the still-enforceable contract called The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America; as well as selecting the correct definitions that apply to those exact words must be used. The entire perspective of CleanHonestGov.Com is that the Founding Generation, in their selection of words used in The Declaration, along with what those words meant to them (according to already-published dictionaries at that time) is....
Among the many benefits to the governed people that the CONSENT of the governed phrase demands is that whomever or whatever is on the ballot, it is they who are responsible of educating and informing the body of registered voters in order to get the majority of the total body of registered voters to consent; or it must FAIL-For Lack of Consent. |
|
|
HOW DOES ALL THIS WORK? First a word from George Carlin.
|
Context for Consent of the Governed
From the top of the second paragraph of The unanimous Declaration, it states:
"We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness — That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." First of all, we must recognize one fact about the times around 1776. With the political abuses from The Crown, the idea with the new government would be to make it as difficult and as painful for government officers to repeat those political abuses. The primary purpose for The unanimous Declaration is the security of the governed peoples' rights. The best way to do this is to reduce the ease by which corruption enters government; while also increasing the ease by which to remove the corruption that does enter. With this idea in mind, consider the definitions for Consent and To Consent (above) when reading the actual words written in the still-enforceable contract of The unanimous Declaration: "Governments[...] derive their just powers from the consent of the governed." By definition; Consent of the governed requires that the majority of the total known body of registered voters actively grant their consent — or whatever or whomever is on the ballot must fail for lack of consent. The CONSENT definitions; Tendency to one point; or To be of the same mind; tells an entirely contrary story from that of the modern vote–count practice. It is the duty of the people who want a balloted item or candidate to pass to convince the majority of the total body of registered voters that it is important enough for that voter to get a consenting vote to the polling station on time. When 60% or more of all people registered as voters do not check in at the polls to consent to any item or any candidate — we see a tendency to one point. The majority, being of the same mind, for whatever their individual reason, did not consent to anything or anyone on the ballot. They cannot all be that lazy. They cannot all be that apathetic. They cannot all be that unpatriotic. However, when we see those who do get sworn into office and that which is enforced against us; we do see a trend within government, which is against the charters and against the peoples' vote, where most of it should not be sworn in or enforced. Thus, the majority of the Total Number of registered voters do have a pretty good handle on getting and keeping Clean Honest Government. WE must enforce the power of their non-consenting vote-count. When so few people can be convinced that a balloted item or person is worthy enough to warrant using their time and energy going to the polls to consent — the balloted items all must fail for lack of consent. |
|
Different formatsSoonish, the entire content of CleanHonestGov.Com will be available on the storage device of nearly any choice (such as; sim, sd, flash, thumb, paper, etc.) —still working on it.
Ask me about completion date at danielmkingery@gmail.com subject: CleanHonestGov.Com storage devices. Otherwise, feel at liberty to download the entire website onto your own device of choice. |