?Still Doing the Same-Ole-Thing As Generations Past?
Still waiting for government officials to hold themselves accountable?
Our governments are only as clean and honest as the people who elect the key persons into office. Corruption in government is only a symptom of the people as a body.
Until our body of citizens -- especially that of our voters -- become much better informed about where to learn about our rights and duties with respect to controlling our governments; we will keep getting more of the same and worsening corruption.
Nearly every united [sic] States American will tell you that the government is supposed to get it powers from "We the people". Unfortunately, far too few can cite the proper written authority for our power over our governments.
I'll leave you to either enjoy or despise the remainder of this website as I leave you with this provable fact: The unanimous Declaration of the [then thirteen - now fifty] united States of America; which is also most awfully known as The Declaration of Independence. Because of that single-purposed alias, almost no one recognizes The unanimous Declaration as the peoples' most important guiding principle with respect to how we are supposed to control our governments. It contains for us:
Governments continue to violate voters who typically do not consent to grant to government unjust powers.
And -- Because our great-great-grandparents, great-grandparents, grandparents, and parents allowed vote-counters to not count 100% of the total number of voter's votes --------> So do we. Then we wonder why our government officers get all the more corrupted with each election.
If you do not wish to read the page content here, which is intended to make us question why we do some things in our lives, you may go directly to the page on how To Properly Control Government, which was the home page just a bit ago. Or you can visit any of the other pages, such as We Own Our Government and what Consent of the Governed means.
Folks, I am very exhausted. I started looking into this subject matter in the 1980's, completed the rough draft of the book in 2006, and been campaigning ever since to spread the word about what our nation should be looking like today. With this website-content and the content of the website where the completed book's unedited rough draft of Self-Governance and Corruption-Free Government .....Oh..... I'll keep going, talking to one or two people at at time, still trying to find another person who recognizes the plan for our nation, its design and intended path. Just one more person.
But it is not up to me -- It is up to all of us to make it happen -- if it is what you desire. The making of our nation was never intended for one person to do it alone not even if they could. Our nation is supposed to benefit all of us and be the work created by us all.
Our governments are only as clean and honest as the people who elect the key persons into office. Corruption in government is only a symptom of the people as a body.
Until our body of citizens -- especially that of our voters -- become much better informed about where to learn about our rights and duties with respect to controlling our governments; we will keep getting more of the same and worsening corruption.
Nearly every united [sic] States American will tell you that the government is supposed to get it powers from "We the people". Unfortunately, far too few can cite the proper written authority for our power over our governments.
I'll leave you to either enjoy or despise the remainder of this website as I leave you with this provable fact: The unanimous Declaration of the [then thirteen - now fifty] united States of America; which is also most awfully known as The Declaration of Independence. Because of that single-purposed alias, almost no one recognizes The unanimous Declaration as the peoples' most important guiding principle with respect to how we are supposed to control our governments. It contains for us:
- The sole purpose for our governments = help us secure our rights
- Details how our votes are supposed to be counted = consent (50% or more of the total) of the governed/registered voters of today
- Warns us to not get comfortable with the "minor" political injustices because you give the government an inch of your rights it will take a mile of them
- It lists nearly 30 political powers forever off limits to all our government officers
- Among other important properties, it also states our nation's True Pledge to each other.
Governments continue to violate voters who typically do not consent to grant to government unjust powers.
And -- Because our great-great-grandparents, great-grandparents, grandparents, and parents allowed vote-counters to not count 100% of the total number of voter's votes --------> So do we. Then we wonder why our government officers get all the more corrupted with each election.
If you do not wish to read the page content here, which is intended to make us question why we do some things in our lives, you may go directly to the page on how To Properly Control Government, which was the home page just a bit ago. Or you can visit any of the other pages, such as We Own Our Government and what Consent of the Governed means.
Folks, I am very exhausted. I started looking into this subject matter in the 1980's, completed the rough draft of the book in 2006, and been campaigning ever since to spread the word about what our nation should be looking like today. With this website-content and the content of the website where the completed book's unedited rough draft of Self-Governance and Corruption-Free Government .....Oh..... I'll keep going, talking to one or two people at at time, still trying to find another person who recognizes the plan for our nation, its design and intended path. Just one more person.
But it is not up to me -- It is up to all of us to make it happen -- if it is what you desire. The making of our nation was never intended for one person to do it alone not even if they could. Our nation is supposed to benefit all of us and be the work created by us all.
E N J O Y
Enjoy this food for thought -- thank to SNOPES.com
Grandma’s Cooking Secret
Legend: Some family traditions are inexplicable . . . as one bride found out when she finally thought to question why cutting off the ends of the roast before cooking the meat made for a better result.
Examples:
[Collected on the Internet, 1994]
The new Jewish bride is making her first big dinner for her husband and tries her hand at her mother’s brisket recipe, cutting off the ends of the roast the way her mother always did. Hubby thinks the meat is delicious, but says, “Why do you cut off the ends — that’s the best part!” She answers, “That’s the way my mother always made it.”
The next week, they go to the old bubbie’s house, and she prepares the famous brisket recipe, again cutting off the ends. The young bride is sure she must be missing some vital information, so she askes her grandma why she cut off the ends. Grandma says, “Dahlink, that’s the only way it will fit in the pan!”
[Ziglar, 1975]
In this respect, they are as bad as “this old boy down home.” His wife sent him to the store for a ham. After he bought it, she asked him why he didn’t have the butcher cut off the end of the ham. “This old boy” asked his wife why she wanted the end cut off. She replied that her mother had always done it that way and that was reason enough for her. Since the wife’s mother was visiting, they asked her why she always cut off the end of the ham. Mother replied that this was the way her mother did it; Mother, daughter and “this old boy” then decided to call grandmother and solve this three-generation mystery. Grandmother promptly replied that she cut the end of the ham because her roaster was too small to cook it in one piece.
Variations:
In many tellings, the bride emulates her mother’s behavior and her mother is found to be but doing what her mother always did. Bride and mother consult with the grandmother only to discover that Grandma’s “secret” had to do with a too-small roasting pan. Two generations have slavishly followed the tradition without understanding it.
Origins: Setting up housekeeping is a daunting yet satisfying task as the bride strives to create a home for herself and her husband, not just a bare-walls place to live. (Grooms appear to be far less motivated in this regard — if it has a TV, sofa, and refrigerator, they figure it’s about as done as it gets.) In creating her nest, it’s assumed the bride will make mistakes early on as she finds out the hard way that what looked so easy when Mom was doing it is a bit more difficult on one’s own. Burnt dinners and tears go together, but eventually a satisfactory homelife is settled into as major purchases are made, redecoration is accomplished, and traditions established within this new family. Throughout the upheaval, the bride is expected to look to her mother for a living example of how to pull it all together and to rely on her advice.
It’s upon this assumption this legend rests. Many of the secrets of being a good cook are counterintuitive, and it’s easy to adopt an “I don’t know how this works, I just know it does” stance as yet another of Mom’s recipes proves to turn out only when certain procedures are rigidly followed. The stage is set, so to speak, for the “too big for the pan” joke.
Often told within the Jewish religion, this tale is a parable for teaching the importance of understanding the whys of religious rituals. It is not enough, says this legend, to perform by rote — if observance is to have value, the reasons behind a tradition have to be appreciated as well as the ritual itself faithfully carried out. What better way to express this concept than by telling a tale of a bride and a trimmed roast?
In 2001, the following version of this classic appeared in the Canadian edition of Reader’s Digest:
When my friend Dale opens a can, she always turns it upside down to open it from the bottom. One day her young son asked her why. “I don’t really know,” she said. “My mom always did it that way.” She decided to call her mom and ask.
“When we brought the cans up from the cellar, the tops were always dusty,” her mother explained. “I couldn’t be bothered to clean them, so I turned them upside down and opened the bottom.”
This account came to us from a reader in 2005:
I was cooking Thanksgiving dinner with my friend who comes from a long line of Black Southern cooks! We were going to cook like 10 different desserts and take them to Grandma’s house for the big day!
Well, with every cake that went into the oven, a pan of water went in too… I didn’t ask him why, while cooking, figuring that surely it was some secret for making the cakes more moist.
He made sure to point this out to his mother when we arrived. She complimented him on his remembering. I am brave enough to ask, in this crowded kitchen, with food laid out for at least 50 people. His grandmother pipes in…
“I used to put a pan of water in there because my racks were uneven.”
In 2003 a reader mailed us an especially enjoyable version of the tale:
A young woman is preparing her first thanksgiving dinner. As she gets everything ready for thanksgiving day, she very sternly reminds herself to let the turkey finish thawing in the sink overnight. She puts it in and places the dishrack over the top of the bird. Her husband walks into the kitchen and sees this. “Why are you doing that?” he asks.
“My mom always did that to help the turkey thaw” she told him.
The next day Mom calls to see how everything is going. “Fine, Ma. I have everything ready to go in the oven. I even remembered to put the rack over the turkey last night.”
This seemed to confuse her mother a bit. “What are you talking about?” she asked.
“Oh, I remember you always put the dish rack over the turkey when it was thawing in the sink,” she said.
There was a pause on the end of the line. “Yes, but honey, we had cats!”
Just to prove it’s not only the ladies who fall into the trap of imitating without understanding, we leave you with this bit of humor from 1958:
A more frightened than injured young Seabee electrician was brought into the hospital suffering from electrical burns. Shortly afterward his instructor, a chief electrician, arrived. “Why on earth didn’t you turn off the main power switch before you tried to splice the wires?” asked the chief.
“I wanted to save time, chief, and I’ve seen you stand on one leg, grab the wires and splice without turning off the power.”
“My God, kid,” exclaimed the chief. “Didn’t you know I have a wooden leg?”
Barbara “wooden you know it?” Mikkelson
Sightings: This legend surfaces in a 1994 episode of television’s The Commish: Tony Scali asks one of his officers why he makes five copies of each document only to always throw away the fifth and is told “That’s the way we’ve always done it.” In retaliation, the Commish tells the “ends cut off the roast” story.
Last updated: 3 November 2005
Sources:
Brunvand, Jan Harold. Curses! Broiled Again!
New York: W. W. Norton, 1989. ISBN 0-393-30711-5 (pp. 191-192).
Brunvand, Jan Harold. Too Good to Be True.
New York: W. W. Norton, 1999. ISBN 0-393-04734-2 (pp. 146-147).
Mays, Alan E. “The Pan Was Too Small.”
FOAFTale News. June 1996 (pp. 15-16).
Ziglar, Zig. See You At the Top.
Gretna, LA: Pelican, 1975. ISBN 0-88289-126-X (p. 148).
Reader’s Digest. “Humor in Uniform.”
February 1958 (p. 20).
Reader’s Digest (Canadian edition). “Life’s Like That.”
February 2001 (p. 192).
BY DAVID MIKKELSON
PUBLISHED 6 JULY 2008
FILED UNDER ASP ARTICLE , NEWLYWEDSDear Reader,Snopes.com has long been engaged in the battle against misinformation, an effort we could not sustain without support from our audience. Producing reliable fact-checking and thorough investigative reporting requires significant resources. We pay writers, editors, web developers, and other staff who work tirelessly to provide you with an invaluable service: evidence-based, contextualized analysis of facts. Help us keep Snopes.com strong. Make a direct contribution today. Learn More.
Donate with PayPal
THe above PAYPal DONATION button solely benefits Snopes.com
Grandma’s Cooking Secret
Legend: Some family traditions are inexplicable . . . as one bride found out when she finally thought to question why cutting off the ends of the roast before cooking the meat made for a better result.
Examples:
[Collected on the Internet, 1994]
The new Jewish bride is making her first big dinner for her husband and tries her hand at her mother’s brisket recipe, cutting off the ends of the roast the way her mother always did. Hubby thinks the meat is delicious, but says, “Why do you cut off the ends — that’s the best part!” She answers, “That’s the way my mother always made it.”
The next week, they go to the old bubbie’s house, and she prepares the famous brisket recipe, again cutting off the ends. The young bride is sure she must be missing some vital information, so she askes her grandma why she cut off the ends. Grandma says, “Dahlink, that’s the only way it will fit in the pan!”
[Ziglar, 1975]
In this respect, they are as bad as “this old boy down home.” His wife sent him to the store for a ham. After he bought it, she asked him why he didn’t have the butcher cut off the end of the ham. “This old boy” asked his wife why she wanted the end cut off. She replied that her mother had always done it that way and that was reason enough for her. Since the wife’s mother was visiting, they asked her why she always cut off the end of the ham. Mother replied that this was the way her mother did it; Mother, daughter and “this old boy” then decided to call grandmother and solve this three-generation mystery. Grandmother promptly replied that she cut the end of the ham because her roaster was too small to cook it in one piece.
Variations:
In many tellings, the bride emulates her mother’s behavior and her mother is found to be but doing what her mother always did. Bride and mother consult with the grandmother only to discover that Grandma’s “secret” had to do with a too-small roasting pan. Two generations have slavishly followed the tradition without understanding it.
- Oftentimes it’s the new husband who insists upon questioning the inexplicable procedure because his wife appears not to care about its mechanics. In her world, that it works is enough; understanding its mystery is beside the point.
- Variations of the tale include cutting the bones out of the drumsticks before roasting the turkey or removing the drumsticks and cooking them in a separate pan (the oven was too small to roast the bird intact), cutting two inches off a new broom (short broom closet), always removing the bottom lid of a can (tops were dusty), and fastening balls of cotton onto a new screen door “to keep out the flies” (Mom used to stuff cotton balls into holes in the ancient screen door).
Origins: Setting up housekeeping is a daunting yet satisfying task as the bride strives to create a home for herself and her husband, not just a bare-walls place to live. (Grooms appear to be far less motivated in this regard — if it has a TV, sofa, and refrigerator, they figure it’s about as done as it gets.) In creating her nest, it’s assumed the bride will make mistakes early on as she finds out the hard way that what looked so easy when Mom was doing it is a bit more difficult on one’s own. Burnt dinners and tears go together, but eventually a satisfactory homelife is settled into as major purchases are made, redecoration is accomplished, and traditions established within this new family. Throughout the upheaval, the bride is expected to look to her mother for a living example of how to pull it all together and to rely on her advice.
It’s upon this assumption this legend rests. Many of the secrets of being a good cook are counterintuitive, and it’s easy to adopt an “I don’t know how this works, I just know it does” stance as yet another of Mom’s recipes proves to turn out only when certain procedures are rigidly followed. The stage is set, so to speak, for the “too big for the pan” joke.
Often told within the Jewish religion, this tale is a parable for teaching the importance of understanding the whys of religious rituals. It is not enough, says this legend, to perform by rote — if observance is to have value, the reasons behind a tradition have to be appreciated as well as the ritual itself faithfully carried out. What better way to express this concept than by telling a tale of a bride and a trimmed roast?
In 2001, the following version of this classic appeared in the Canadian edition of Reader’s Digest:
When my friend Dale opens a can, she always turns it upside down to open it from the bottom. One day her young son asked her why. “I don’t really know,” she said. “My mom always did it that way.” She decided to call her mom and ask.
“When we brought the cans up from the cellar, the tops were always dusty,” her mother explained. “I couldn’t be bothered to clean them, so I turned them upside down and opened the bottom.”
This account came to us from a reader in 2005:
I was cooking Thanksgiving dinner with my friend who comes from a long line of Black Southern cooks! We were going to cook like 10 different desserts and take them to Grandma’s house for the big day!
Well, with every cake that went into the oven, a pan of water went in too… I didn’t ask him why, while cooking, figuring that surely it was some secret for making the cakes more moist.
He made sure to point this out to his mother when we arrived. She complimented him on his remembering. I am brave enough to ask, in this crowded kitchen, with food laid out for at least 50 people. His grandmother pipes in…
“I used to put a pan of water in there because my racks were uneven.”
In 2003 a reader mailed us an especially enjoyable version of the tale:
A young woman is preparing her first thanksgiving dinner. As she gets everything ready for thanksgiving day, she very sternly reminds herself to let the turkey finish thawing in the sink overnight. She puts it in and places the dishrack over the top of the bird. Her husband walks into the kitchen and sees this. “Why are you doing that?” he asks.
“My mom always did that to help the turkey thaw” she told him.
The next day Mom calls to see how everything is going. “Fine, Ma. I have everything ready to go in the oven. I even remembered to put the rack over the turkey last night.”
This seemed to confuse her mother a bit. “What are you talking about?” she asked.
“Oh, I remember you always put the dish rack over the turkey when it was thawing in the sink,” she said.
There was a pause on the end of the line. “Yes, but honey, we had cats!”
Just to prove it’s not only the ladies who fall into the trap of imitating without understanding, we leave you with this bit of humor from 1958:
A more frightened than injured young Seabee electrician was brought into the hospital suffering from electrical burns. Shortly afterward his instructor, a chief electrician, arrived. “Why on earth didn’t you turn off the main power switch before you tried to splice the wires?” asked the chief.
“I wanted to save time, chief, and I’ve seen you stand on one leg, grab the wires and splice without turning off the power.”
“My God, kid,” exclaimed the chief. “Didn’t you know I have a wooden leg?”
Barbara “wooden you know it?” Mikkelson
Sightings: This legend surfaces in a 1994 episode of television’s The Commish: Tony Scali asks one of his officers why he makes five copies of each document only to always throw away the fifth and is told “That’s the way we’ve always done it.” In retaliation, the Commish tells the “ends cut off the roast” story.
Last updated: 3 November 2005
Sources:
Brunvand, Jan Harold. Curses! Broiled Again!
New York: W. W. Norton, 1989. ISBN 0-393-30711-5 (pp. 191-192).
Brunvand, Jan Harold. Too Good to Be True.
New York: W. W. Norton, 1999. ISBN 0-393-04734-2 (pp. 146-147).
Mays, Alan E. “The Pan Was Too Small.”
FOAFTale News. June 1996 (pp. 15-16).
Ziglar, Zig. See You At the Top.
Gretna, LA: Pelican, 1975. ISBN 0-88289-126-X (p. 148).
Reader’s Digest. “Humor in Uniform.”
February 1958 (p. 20).
Reader’s Digest (Canadian edition). “Life’s Like That.”
February 2001 (p. 192).
BY DAVID MIKKELSON
PUBLISHED 6 JULY 2008
FILED UNDER ASP ARTICLE , NEWLYWEDSDear Reader,Snopes.com has long been engaged in the battle against misinformation, an effort we could not sustain without support from our audience. Producing reliable fact-checking and thorough investigative reporting requires significant resources. We pay writers, editors, web developers, and other staff who work tirelessly to provide you with an invaluable service: evidence-based, contextualized analysis of facts. Help us keep Snopes.com strong. Make a direct contribution today. Learn More.
Donate with PayPal
THe above PAYPal DONATION button solely benefits Snopes.com
