B revity
Recently, on the receiving end of a long-winded conversation, my focus,brevity; providing only the information necessary to obtaining and maintaining Clean Honest Government.
All the other website pages will soon disappear. Content placed on this page under its own section heading, such as the "Brevity" up top.
This is a Tour-Guide style presentation. Information is presented in an order that makes the most sense. You will have to at least click each item to reveal the next information. Whether you read the information at each click is entirely up to you.
T hat L ittle B lack ▶ to the above-right, indicates hidden information. Click anywhere in this black text area to show or hide the content.
This is where the additional content appears
CleanHonestGov.Com is your guided tour on exactly how to morally, ethically, and properly control government according to the still–enforceable contract among us, as united States Americans [and yes, the spelling is correct].
Just for clarity; morally, ethically, and properly are defined as an average–majority decision of a known number of people in accord with the terms of the contract that binds them. Those resources and contracts are identified later.
In order to get to the end, you must at least click on, and open, each section; just like following the tour guide. Once you get to the end of the tour, you have the keys to wonder throughout the content to revisit areas you found more interesting.
If It, Clean Honest Government, Is To Be — It Is Up To You & Me
With that, let us proceed to...
The Declaration — The Constitution — and The Law
&
The Plan — The Practice — and The Perception
The Declaration
The Declaration is the foundation upon which The Constitution is built. Without Declarational authority, those constitutional elements are void — and must not be exercised.
The Constitution
The Constitution is the framework upon which every law must hang. Without constitutional authority, that law is void — and not enforceable.
The Law
The Law is tyranny, despotism, and treason when The Constitution does not authorize its existence.
The Plan — The Practice — and The Perception
The Plan
The Plan was to have a very strictly limited — but powerful enough to do its job government.
The Practice
The Practice. has returned us to the 1776 Tyranny and Despotism — on steroids.
The Perception
The Perception by many people is that the government is only doing what is necessary to maintain a peaceable society.
The next several sections are general information about: Sources & Resources; Content Layout Parts: Text, Audio–Video, Dictionaries, and Snapshots; Why Content Differs From What's Commonly Taught; Content Easily Adapts Worldwide; and Your Rights to Reproduce Content.
From here? The introduction to this unique perspective and detailing what we can do to better our social–political relationship with each other.
Once all the text is entered; videos and audio content make it more accessible under different environments.
Please enjoy & critique as you proceed.
Thank you.
I nformation A bout
S ources & R esources
Daniel M. Kingery created CleanHonestGov.Com. He dusts off and revives the design by which the governed people are supposed to control and hold their respective government personnel accountable. That design has not yet been enforced by The Governed People who would benefit most from it.
After this presentation, is a link to the resources listed below. On the Resources Page, are links to a proposed new constitution; constitutional Executive Orders; Constitutional Amendments; as well as several government projects and programs solving green energy, jobs, environment, and more.
• The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, 1776;
• Digitized 1756 two-volume set common-use dictionary, by Samuel L. Johnson;
• The Articles of Confederation, 1778;
• The Definitive Treaty of Peace, 1784;
• The Constitution for the United States of America, 1790;
• Digitized 1785 two-volume set common-use dictionary, by Samuel L. Johnson;
• The Law of Nations, by Emer de Vattle, 1758;
• as well as newer common-use dictionaries for the more recent amendments.
C ontent L ayout P arts: T ext, A udio–V ideo, D ictionaries, & S napshots
W hy C ontent D iffers F rom W hat's C ommonly T aught
The content within is restricted to the actual text of the ratified documents and to that of common-use dictionaries that existed as close to and just prior to the signing of those documents.
This method gets as close to what the content meant to the most people of that signing-generation.
The Meaning At Time Of Use is the correct process because each of the documents contain amendment provisions to keep them up to date with the changing times. This should remove the temptation to misrepresent the content by those whom the documents govern.
Where others blame the government, politicians, media, big business, religion, and such for corruption in government — CleanHonestGov.Com differs most, because it is we the governed people who are to blame. We, the governed people are responsible for guiding our politicians. They are not responsible for controlling us.
In this work, we, the governed people, are solely to blame for the path we allow our government officers to take our nation and our government.
We've let our military and police off the hook for not stopping our domestic enemies in government, including; legislators who pass unconstitutional laws; fellow officers who violate the governed people's rights by enforcing those unconstitutional laws; judges and lawyers who prevent or don't use the constitution in the courts to prove how the law violates The Constitution for the United States of America; of which, Article 6 makes those laws void and not enforceable.
Worst of all, we let ourselves off the hook while violating other people's rights at the polling stations; by authorizing government to do acts and things that The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America prohibits us from granting to government in the first place.
CleanHonestGov.Com...
• ...shows how easy it is for the governed people to properly control their government.
• ...disproves most of what formal government–regulated schools teach about Vote–Counting.
• ...breathes new life into the 1700's information that was intended for us to use — even today.
C ontent E asily A dapts W orldwide
Though worded specific to these united States of America [sic], at this time; this content easily adapts for people anywhere on Earth.
We must see our governments as entities we, as the governed people, own and control.
Later sections identify the designed Context, Perspective, Documents & The People's Rights relative to Government Powers.
Broadly painted at this point, all governments originally start out protecting the people's rights. When left unchecked and unpunished, those governments become tyrannical.
Y our R ights to R eproduce C ontent
What Clean Honest Government really needs are people... Lots of people... Word-of-Mouth People... — You – type people!
You possess the right to reproduce/copy all this material and pass it around. Do not rely on the overly censored mass- and social-media companies to make it easy. It is not pirating, when you have permission.
Make the content your own; dress it up, take it out. Keep talking it up. Keep spreading it around. Once you make the content your own; you need no one's permission.
So long as we work together from the same design plan at the same time; we... are....
Keys on how to print out entire content is explained at the very end.
Would you like to fire some people in elected offices — before the next election?
N O T RICK Q UESTION. N O F UNNY B USINESS.
All we have to do, is learn how to
Hint:
Nationally, we got really close to truly firing most of our corrupted government officers. Our recent reality–show producer and host became our government's president on his show's catch–phrase, "Y o u' r e f i r e d !" along with his Drain the Swamp campaign slogan.
Real life rarely plays out as neatly as scripted reality–shows.
If you read the About information in the above section, you may have an idea where we're headed.
Fist: A word from Mr. Occam
Occam's Razor:
When more than one explanation accounts for all the facts, the simpler one is more likely to be correct.
The simplest explanation starts with — P ARADOX: defined as — Seemingly absurd or self-contradicting statements or propositions that when investigated or explained prove to be well founded or true.
— PARADOX #1 —
Clean Honest Government!
--
— PARADOX #2 —
Every Registered Voter Does Vote!
Continue this investigation–tour that reveals and explains these well–founded truths.
— PARADOX #1 —
Clean Honest Government!
--
— PARADOX #2 —
Every Registered Voter Does Vote!
Continue this investigation–tour that reveals and explains these well–founded truths.
Many people claim that Clean Honest Government is an impossible goal. Probably why too few ever try to make it real.
What if I told you — That if we counted every registered voter's vote in accord with the terms of a still–enforceable contract, a large majority of people in all elected offices would never have been sworn in the first time, let alone for the rest of their natural life?
Election fraud?
Yes. But not quite the same as that publicized during the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. This fraud goes back more than one–hundred years.
So why is no one talking about it?
Simple.
We've been conditioned, through an educational system, to not be able to recognize the proof. We've been taught to refer to such a systems in foreign countries as propaganda machines, indoctrination camps, and the like.
We missed it, simply because we are taught to look for the speck of dust in our neighbor's eye, while ignoring the rock in our own eye.
Before we go to that contract that contains the information, we look up three definitions from 1756 to establish — the simplest, correct explanation. The perspective from which to view our government charters; that is, if We the Governed People truly are supposed to control our government.
T HE S IMPLEST P ERSPECTIVE
— IS ALSO —
A U NIQUE P ERSPECTIVE
....starts with these three 1756 definitions that reveal our viewing perspective and the informational context
....starts with these three 1756 definitions that reveal our viewing perspective and the informational context
1. C ORPORATE — C ORPORATION – (1756)
CORPORATE. a.
United in a body or community. Emphasis added
CORPORATION. s.
A body politick, authorized to have a common seal , one head officer or more, able by their common consent, to grant or receive in law, any thing within the compass of their charter ; even as one man. Emphasis added
1a. C OMMUNITY (1756)
COMMUNITY. s.
1. The commonwealth ; the body politick. Emphasis added
2. Common possession.
1b. T o I NCORPORATE — I NCORPORATION – (1756)
To INCORPORATE. v. a.
3. To form into a corporation, or body politick. Emphasis added
4. To unite; to associate.
INCORPORATION. s.
2. Formation of a body politick. Emphasis added
2. P OLITICAL — P OLITICKS – (1756)
POLITICAL. a. 1 of 2
1. Relating to politicks ; relating to the administration of publick affairs. Emphasis added
POLITICKS. s. 2 of 2
The science of government ; the art or practice of administring publick affairs. Emphasis added
3. G OVERNMENT – (1756)
GOVERNMENT. s.
1. Form of community with respect to the disposition of the supreme authority. Emphasis added
2. An establishment of legal authority.
3. Administration of publick affairs. Emphasis added
Definitions for words change over time.
Recognizing the government — as corporation – connection happened while looking for the CONSENT in a digitized 1756 dictionary. The word CORPORATION caught my eye.
Because of the above definitions, the corporate perspective makes government easier to comprehend; thus, easier to properly control. Most people are familiar with the hiring and firing process of corporation; either from the receiving and/or the giving end.
Contrary to Occam's Razor, most civics, government, law, political science teachers and professors either skim over, down–play, or, completely ignore the most important Fact of all; the 1776 document titled The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America.
It is most popularly known as The Declaration of Independence, a name that makes it easy to ignore and eliminates it most important use by the people as the Proof of Ownership document that it is.
So why a 1756 dictionary, as opposed to more modern 1806 and 1828, written by one of the document's signers (favored by many constitution scholars, who claim them as truly American Dictionaries); or even 2020 dictionaries?
Because: Words generally have three stages of meaning:
• ....the original meaning. What the word meant at the time it was first use in history.
• ....the Usage Meaning. What the word meant at the time it was used (any time after its first recorded use), perhaps in a law or contract. Often, incorrectly referred to as "Original Meaning".
• ....the present-day meaning. What the word means at the time any person reads any words written from a previous generation.
Using any dictionary not published and in common use prior to writing the document — especially public documents; whether intended or not, may alter the meanings of important words; — thus changing the meaning and purpose for that content.
Stated earlier, many experts like Noah Webster's 1828 Dictionary, because he was one of the signers. Because of Webster's decades–later publication date, research credibility deteriorates (no matter how similar some of Webster's definitions may be to those used in 1776 and 1785) dictionaries.
We must also remember that The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 prohibits Congress; were Section 10, Clause 2 prohibits the States from Ex Post Facto law–making.
Since the Ex Post Facto practice is expressly prohibited in law making; teaching people to define words used in those laws — must follow the same Ex Post Facto prohibition. Otherwise, dictionary publishers exercise an unconstitutional amendment power
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America; is the authority for what powers get granted to government for them pass laws, enforce laws, and punish according to the laws made by government.
The Constitution for the United States of America is the authority for what laws the government may pass. The powers granted to the government must be in accord with The Declaration. The laws made by government must be in accord with The Constitution.
Webster's Dictionary or any newer resource for definitions (such as; dictionaries, court rulings, laws, executive orders, etc.) not available for common use, during the time of writing the document, cannot honorably define the words used within that document.
In fact, using newer definitions bypass the agreed–to amendment processes of Article 5 of The Constitution and the people’s right to alter, abolish, and throw off corrupted government from The Declaration; bot, quite literally — an Ex Post Facto practice.
With that; — This work's focus is the meanings at the time used; often, but mistakenly referred to as original meaning (a mistake I correct in myself, when I catch it).
The above definitions show the synonymous link between corporations and government. This link establishes the most correct and the simplest perspective for proper comprehension and application of our government charters.
— Because most people are familiar with the business corporation's hiring and firing; the government–as–corporation perspective makes it clearer to see how to remove government personnel from office (elected, appointed, hired, volunteered, etc.).
O THER C LARIFYING D EFINITIONS
These definitions describe document characteristics that set The Corporate–Government Founding Charter apart from The Corporate–Government By-Laws.
These definitions describe document characteristics that set The Corporate–Government Founding Charter apart from The Corporate–Government By-Laws.
T HE F OUNDING C HARTER
The first set of definitions describe document characteristics for The Corporate–Government Founding Charter; which is The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
The first set of definitions describe document characteristics for The Corporate–Government Founding Charter; which is The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
1. T o F OUND – (1756)
To FOUND. v. a.
3. To establish ; to erect.
5. To raise upon, as on a principle or ground. Emphasis added
2. C HARTER – (1756)
CHARTER. s.
1. A charter is a written evidence.
2. Any writing bestowing privileges or rights.
3. Privilege ; immunity ; exemption.
2a. T o B ESTOW – (1756)
To BESTOW. v. a.
1. To give ; to confer upon.
5. To apply
2b. T o C ONFER – (1756)
To CONFER. v, a.
To discourse with another upon a stated subject.
To CONFER. v. a.
1. To compare.
2. To give ; to bestow.
3. To contribute ; to conduce.
2c. D ISCOURSE — T o D ISCOURSE – (1756)
DISCOURSE. s.
1. The act of the understanding, by which it passes from premises to consequences.
2. Conversation ; mutual intercourse of language ; talk.
4. A treatise ; a dissertatian either written or uttered.
To DISCOURSE. v. n.
1. To converse ; to talk ; to relate.
2. To treat upon in a solemn or set manner.
3. To reason ; to pass from premises to consequences.
2d. T o A PPLY – (1756)
To APPLY. v. a.
3. To make use of as relative or suitable.
4. To put to a certain use.
5. To use as means to an end.
7. To have recourse to, as a petitioner.
2e. R ECOURSE – (1756)
RECOURSE. (s.)
2. Return ; new attack.
3. Application as for help or protection.
4. Access.
The Declaration's continuing importance as The Corporate Founding Charter for controlling government...
The Declaration is the governed peoples' proof of ownership as well as right & duty to control their government; same as the Corporate Founding Charter is for the corporation's owners and voting members.
The unanimous Declaration of the [then thirteen and now fifty] united States of America (unfortunately referred to as The Declaration of Independence), has never been amended, repealed, or replaced. Just neglected by the very people it is designed to benefit; the citizen; the governed people.
The Declaration remains to this day, a binding and enforceable contract among all united States Americans (same as the Corporate Charter is among its owners and voters) with respect to how we are supposed to properly control our government. It details...
• ...the powers that the governed people, may of right grant to government, which are very limited;
• ...voter eligibility;
• ...how votes are supposed to be counted, which is very precise;
• ...from where government gets its honorable powers;
• ...representation;
• ...much more.
These voting rules have been unchanged since 1776 and still apply to any balloted items, including candidates, whether for the city, county, state, or national government level. The citizen's neglect of these rules allowed politicians to simply continue the British election practices to which the people had become accustomed and most of the British political ties (such as; slavery, denied voting and other rights) to remain unchanged, even to this day.
The Declaration is the contract that founded our nation as the united States of America (the union of States).
The Declaration is the Founding Corporate Charter for our government, in that it establishes the principle upon which to build our governments. It is the governed people's lawfully enforceable ownership and control over government agreement.
The unanimous Declaration provides so much more information for us, the governed-people, who are, when unified for this purpose, the sovereign authority responsible for properly controlling our government officers.
With our proof of ownership over government, it is an honor to be called — the governed, responsible for creating and controlling our government; a task we cannot honorably exercise unless we unify for that cause. Thus, we are — in deed, Governed by ourselves.
As the lawful and contractual corporate owners and controllers over our government, we must begin acting like responsible owners do for any profitable commercial enterprise, treating our government officers as our employees — not royalty.
None of our employees are so valuable that we should not remove and/or replace them before their contract ends. That is all the elections are, entering a contract with candidate–employees. None are above the Law of The Constitution we set over them to better secure our rights.
Insert profit segment from Maryln Monroe film Home–Town Story
It should start at about 37:07 talking about profits to the customer. It is about 3 minutes.
Profit to the customer, the governed people: Some additional reasons why The unanimous Declaration remains important and enforceable for us today include:
• We still remain in the course of human events — thus still enforceable
• Lists over 24 political powers off-limits to our government, that presently exercises nearly all of them
• Details our nation's foreign, trade, and war policy
• Warns people against becoming comfortable with unauthorized and treasonous government restrictions against our rights
• Informs us what we must do when our governments no longer work to secure our rights
• Details the purpose for our nation and the system of our nation's Democracy — the relationship among the people with respect to our vote and control over government
• Records Our Nation's Real Pledge to each other, which is detailed later in its own section.
T HE B Y– L AWS
This second set of definitions describe document characteristics for The Corporate–Government By-Laws...
This second set of definitions describe document characteristics for The Corporate–Government By-Laws...
1. B Y–L AW – (1756)
BY-LAW. s.
By-laws are orders made for the good of those that make them, farther than the publick law binds.
2. C ONTRACT – (1756)
CONTRACT. s. 2 of 2
1. A bargain ; a compact.
3. A writing in which the terms of a bargain are included.
3. C ONSTITUENT – (1756)
CONSTITUENT s.
1. The person or thing which constitutes or settles any thing.
2. That which is necessary to the subsistence of any thing.
3. He that deputes another.
4. T o C ONSTITUTE — C ONSTITUTION – (1785)
To CONSTITUTE. v. a. 2 of 2
1. To give formal existence ; to produce.
2. To erect ; To establish.
3. To depute.
CONSTITUTION. s. 2 of 2
1. The act of constituting ; enacting ; establishing.
3. Corporeal frame.
6. Established form of government ; system of laws and customs. [emphasis added]
7. Particular law ; establishment ; institution.
The Constitution's continuing use for controlling government...
The Constitution is the governed peoples'
The Constitution is the job–description sheet for evaluating the three major offices (legislative, executive, and judicial) and performance of the officers with respect to election and recalls; same as the Corporate By–Laws are to the commercial corporation.
To review government officers performance to determine whether to recall them for constitutional violations and incompetence, such as treason and lesser crimes; or to simply replace them at the next general election, should a better candidate seek the position.
In addition to The Declaration. it is a tool to know whether government unjustly violates our rights.
S TOPPING C ORRUPTION OF G OVERNMENT — E ASIER T HAN I MAGINED
U SING R EADING & M ATH S TOP P OLITICAL C ORRUPTION
So far; by definition, we see how governments are corporations.
We also see how The Declaration and The US Constitution respectively represent the Corporate Founding Charter an Corporate By-Laws.The Declaration and The US Constitution are, by those same definitions, Corporate documents; each with is specific purpose.
Commercial Corporate documents tell the world who owns the corporation, who has or can get voting power, as well as other vital information.
How we use The Declaration and The Constitution as reading and math story problems to Solve Our Vote–Count, as well as find solutions to end political corruption.
• Reading Comprehension with respect to...
• ...what kinds of power we may of right grant to our governments.
• ...what powers we must never allow our governments to exercise.
• ...warning signs of corruption.
• ...our nation's pledge to each other.
• ...our nation's total foreign policy (war/peace, and trade).
• ...limitations on representative's power.
• ...our rights and duty when our government officers violate our Constitutional By-Laws.
• ...how our votes are supposed to be counted.
• ...how to recognize when any person or government act must be stopped and/or removed; and more...
• Mathematics as it pertains to counting our votes.
• It also requires Elementary Research to figure out what many of the words meant to the generation at the time the document was first signed; especially touching our vote system. We do not concern ourselves with the practice at the time but the design, as written in the contracts.
P HRASEOLOGY
The way a phrase is worded tells the reader a lot:
• Most, by the words used
• Other, by what is not written
• Then, by the definitions of the words used as defined at the time used.
First, some 1756 definitions relating to the phrase about to be introduced. Then, comparing some variants on that phrase with modern practice.
1. P LURALITY – (1756)
PLURALITY n. s.
1. The state of being or having a greater number.
2. A number more than one.
4 The greater number ; the majority. [emphasis added]
2. P OLL — T o P OLL – (1756)
POLL. s.
1. The head.
2. A catalogue or list of persons ; a register of heads.
To POLL. v. a.
4. To take a list or register of persons.
5. To enter one's name in a list or register.
6. To insert into a number as a voter. [emphasis added]
3. P OST – (1756)
POST. s.
6. A piece of timber set erect.
4. T o A BSTAIN – (1785)
To ABSTAIN. .
To forbear, to deny one's self any gratification; with the particle from.
4a. F ORBEAR – (1756)
FORBEAR. s.
1. To cease from any thing; to intermit.
3.To omit voluntarily; not to do; to abstain.
4b. T o O MIT – (1756)
To OMIT. s.
2. To neglect to practice.
5. C ONSENT — T o C ONSENT – (1756)
CONSENT. s.
1. The act of yielding or consenting.
2. Concord ; agreement ; accord.
3. Coherence with ; correspondence.
4. Tendency to one point.
To CONSENT. v. n.
1. To be of the same mind ; to agree.
2. To co–operate to the same end.
The way a phrase is worded tells the reader a lot:
For example: This phrase from The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, states: "Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed" is consent of the governed phrase.
That phrase, "consent of the governed", also could have been written either of theses two ways; which have been described as either a plurality or first past the post:
• ...Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the majority of those registered voters who check in at the polls. This is first past the post..
• ...Or... Governments get their just powers by simply getting one more registered voter's consenting vote than the next closest opposition. This is a simple plurality.
In reverse order...
P LURALITY
With a simple plurality; that of just one more vote than the closest competition; this is the easiest method by which to allow corruption to enter government. It certainly does not encourage the voters be informed at all, let alone well–informed.
The Plurality definitions also work with the two other, more restrictive vote–count methods.
F IRST P AST THE P OST
First Past The Lost is a big step toward eliminating government corruption; simply by making it more difficult to get into office.
As with plurality, this also does not encourage the voters be informed at all, let alone well–informed; simply because it requires no minimum quorum. This post also is not set prior to the race. Not knowing the defined finish line before the race starts — questions the legitimacy of the race.
The Post definitions also work with the two other, vote–count methods, but the setting of the post differs with each method.
C ONSENT OF THE G OVERNED
At present, the votes of those registered as voters,who do not go to the polls, are counted as abstaining; or public opinion has programmed to assume that the registered voter is being lazy, apathetic, or unpatriotic.
We see that with the 1756 definitions above, the registered voter cannot Abstain, Forebear, Cease, or Neglect to vote; until they remove their name from the registry of voters.
With regards to voting, once a person Registers, they register as a voter. They do not register to vote.
The voter registry is not the same as the voter check-in lists. The check lists make certain no registered voter gets or returns more than one ballot. Ballots are necessary for a registered voter to Consent To some thing or some one on the ballot. Thus, the importance concerning The Declaration's phrase, consent of the governed.
Once a person registers as a voter, they only have two options for every balloted item; consent — or Non–Consent. Whether intended or not; not submitting a ballot is Not the same as not voting. It is the same as Not Consenting. Non Consent is a valid vote, in accord with the contract's terms.
H OW D OES A LL T HIS W ORK?
But first some wisdom from George Carlin.
From the top of the second paragraph of The unanimous Declaration, it states:
"We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness — That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
First of all, we must recognize one fact about the times around 1776. With the political abuses from The Crown, the idea with the new government would be to make it as difficult and painful for government officers to repeat those political abuses.
The primary purpose for The unanimous Declaration is the security of the governed people' rights. The best way to do this is to reduce the ease by which corruption enters our government. Then, to increase the ease by which to remove the corruption that does enter.
With this idea in mind, consider the definitions for Consent and To Consent when reading the actual words written in the still-enforceable contract of The unanimous Declaration: "Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed."
By definition; Consent of the governed requires that the majority of the total known body of registered voters actively grant their consent — or whatever or whomever is on the ballot must fail for lack of consent.
The definitions; Tendency to one point; or To be of the same mind; tells an entirely contrary story than the modern vote–count practice.
It is the duty of the people who want a balloted item or candidate to pass to convince he majority of the total body of registered voters that it is important for that voter to get a consenting vote to the pilling station on time.
When 60% or more of all registered as voters do not check in at the polls to consent to any item or any candidate — we see a tendency to one point. The majority, being of the same mind, for whatever their reason, did not consent to anything or anyone on the ballot.
When so few people can be convinced that a balloted item or person is worthy enough to warrant using their time and energy going to the polls to consent — the balloted items all must fail for lack of consent.
T HE V OTER R EGISTRATION AND V OTER C HECKLIST I MPORTANCE
The Voter Registration and The Voter Check–In Lists are of the most important elements for getting Clean Honest Government and to Old Math with respect to calculating whether or not an item or candidate on the ballot passes with sufficient consent or fails for lack of consent.
Absolutely every Registered Voter, does in fact vote every time a ballot goes out in their district. We know this because The Declaration states that government gets its honorable power from "the CONSENT of the governed". This creates a default — non–consent voter position.
Nearly every political jurisdiction in these united States of America has a known number of registered voters. In order to get the consent from that known body, the balloted item must be the first past a specific post/marker. That marker is, at the very least, 50% of the total number of registered voters. Specifically, the balloted item or candidate that first gets 50%+1 of the total number of registered voters to consent — wins. Whatever or whomever is on the ballot that does not get that 50%+1 consenting votes — must fail for lack of consent. This also qualifies PLURALITY's definition number 4. "The greater number ; the majority." [emphasis added]
T HE F IRING — R ECALL E LECTION
The vast majority of registered voters — regardless of personal differences and dislikes for one another — Did NOT and Do NOT consent to most of the politicians who are unlawfully sworn into office.
"Vote Them Out" = Fire Them = RECALL Elections
Not General Election
Waiting for the next General Election rewards politicians whose term AUTOMATICALLY ENDS then anyhow. That is the purpose for the General Election — fill the seat that is about to empty.
RECALL Elections are the only way for the people to FIRE corrupt politicians and to STOP their damage.
It's long past due for us to FIRE most all of our government officials.
Review the Total Recall Campaign for some great ideas and tools about how to get the job done.
C onsent/N on-C onsent V ote-C ount B enefits
• It forces the people of all political parties and across other divides (such as religion, money, sex, age, etc.) to work together to find a candidate common-enough and trusted-enough by the majority of the total number of registered voters to attain their consent. Thus requiring UNITY among the people — no matter what the previous political divide. This unity — governments fear most.
• It saves lots of vote-counting time. If less than 50% of the total number of registered voters check in at the polling stations for a ballot — we know that everything and everyone on the ballots automatically failed for lack of consent.
• It protects the rights of those who choose to not participate in the voting, by not criminalizing or demonizing them if they do not.
• People who do not want to consent to any thing or any one on the ballot need not even go to the polling station, which saves them time from standing in line.
• People who want to consent to some thing or some one on the ballot need not stand in line behind non-consenting voters, which saves them time at the polls as well.
• This demonstrates to all — that the people truly control our government for the first time in our nation's history.
• It automatically eliminates most of the corruption in government because those elected will have earned the trust of the majority of voters — knowing that the majority of voters can remove them from office before the end of their term.
• It eliminates the mob–rule and special-interest voting, which at present allows super–small voting populations to control government.
• Counting votes in this manner also encourages more voters to go to the polls — if they want some item or candidate to pass -- knowing that if they do not consent to that which they want to pass; in not getting a consenting ballot to the polls their vote automatically counts against everything and everyone on the ballot. Because they did not consent.
• The voter registration gets 100% purged more frequently (at the very least once every 3 years), so as to remove the names of those who...
• died
• moved out of the district
• are incarcerated after being duly convicted
• lost interest in voting
• pet names
• and others not qualified to vote in that political jurisdiction; as well as...
• those who choose to not participate in voting, as forced actions rarely produce quality outcome.
• It eliminates the false “need” to vote for the Lesser of Evils.
If I become unable to complete this work, there is more than enough information here, tight now, to get the Cleanest Most–Honest Government these united States of America has ever seen. The rest of the website fills in the details.
Clean Honest Government truly resides in an honest vote–count in accord with the terms of The unanimous Declaration. — Even today it remains a binding contract among us, if ever we decide to enforce it terms that we have agreed to, simply by declaring that we are united States Americans.
Click & Go to Daniel's Sources & Resources.
I ntent F or P rinting E ntire C ontent
This is the governed people's
This is the definitive global civics textbook and instruction manual on how the governed people are supposed to control their government.
Soon, entire content will be available on the storage device of nearly any choice (such as; sim, sd, flash, thumb, paper, etc.)
End Print-Intent Content